Maharashtra

DCF, South Mumbai

CC/34/2012

MR. ANJAY ARVIND KUMAR - Complainant(s)

Versus

ICICI BANK LTD. BRANCH MANAGER - Opp.Party(s)

21 Sep 2012

ORDER

 
CC NO. 34 Of 2012
 
1. MR. ANJAY ARVIND KUMAR
S/O DHANIK LAL SINGH,ASHTVINAYAK HSG.SO. NR. BACHOO GARAGE, ASHOK NAGAR, PIPE LINE, KURLA ANDHERI ROAD, MUMBAI-72
MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. ICICI BANK LTD. BRANCH MANAGER
THE BRANCH MAGAGER, ICICI BANK LTD. FORT BRANCH, NAVASARI BLDG. 240 D.N. ROAD.FORT,MUMBAI.
MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE PRESIDENT
  Shri S.S. Patil , HONORABLE MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
तक्रारदार स्‍वत: हजर.
 ......for the Complainant
 
सामनेवाला गैरहजर.
 ......for the Opp. Party
ORDER

PER SHRI. S.S. PATIL - HON’BLE MEMBER :

Read order passed below delay condonation of application. Even according to the Complainant, delay of more than 4 months and 1 day is caused in filing of this complaint. The Complainant has failed to assign sufficient ground to condone the delay. Therefore, delay condonation application is rejected. Hence, present complaint is dismissed as it is hopelessly barred by law of limitation. No order as to cost.

 
 
[ SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Shri S.S. Patil , HONORABLE]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.