Andhra Pradesh

Kurnool

EA/16/2015

P.Swarnalatha, W/o P.Krishna Reddy, aged about 40 years, HIndu, - Complainant(s)

Versus

ICICI Bank Ltd, Rep.by its Manager - Opp.Party(s)

K.A.Jyothi

22 Jan 2016

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Execution Application No. EA/16/2015
In
Complaint Case No. CC/40/2015
 
1. P.Swarnalatha, W/o P.Krishna Reddy, aged about 40 years, HIndu,
H.No.6/2/111/1, Shabhana Colony,Bala Nagar, Hyderabad-500 037.
Hyderabad
Telangana
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. ICICI Bank Ltd, Rep.by its Manager
H.No.40/384/1, U-Con Plaza,Navarang Theatre Complex,Park Road, Kurnool-518 001
Kurnool
Andhra Pradesh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. M.Sree Latha, B.A, B.L., PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. S.Nazeerunissa B.A., B.L., MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:K.A.Jyothi, Advocate
For the Respondent:
ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER’S FORUM: KURNOOL

Present: Smt. S.Nazeerunnisa, B.A., B.L., Lady Member

And

Smt. Smt.M.Sreelatha, B.A., B.L., Lady Member

Friday the 22nd day of January, 2016

P.P.No.16/2015 IN C.C.No.40/2015

Between:

P.Swarnalatha,

W/o P.Krishna Reddy,

Aged about 40 Years, Hindu,

House Wife, R/o H.No.6/2/111/1,

Shabhana Colony, Bala Nagar,

Hyderabad-500 037.                                             …  Petitioner/Complainant                                                                                                                                                                                    

-Vs-  

   

ICICI Bank Limited,

Represented by its Manager,

H.No.40/384/1, U-Con Plaza,

Navarang Theatre Complex,

Park Road, Kurnool-518 001.                     ... Respondent/Opposite Party

 

This complaint is coming on this day for orders in the presence of Smt.K.A.Jyothi, Advocate for petitioner and opposite party In person (ICICI Bank) and upon perusing the material papers on record, the Forum made the following.

 DOCKET ORDER

(As per Smt. S.Nazeerunnisa, President (FAC))

P.P.No.16/2015 IN C.C.No.40/2015

 

The counsel for petitioner/complainant filed Full satisfaction memo stating that the opposite party paid Rs.55,000/- (Fifty Five Thousand only) through D.D.No.8919 at 12.01.2016.  Respondent present. Respondent filed recall petition in view of petition and memo.  P.P. is closed and recall the warrants against respondent.

 

LADY MEMBER                                                                      PRESIDENT (FAC) 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. M.Sree Latha, B.A, B.L.,]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. S.Nazeerunissa B.A., B.L.,]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.