On an offer made by the O.P. for returning the documents of the complainant on the complainant paying the balance amount due to the O.P. The counsel for the complainant was specifically instructed to advise his client the complainant to approach the O.P. and to sit for settlement as there is sincere offer by the O.P., but the complainant stated to had never gone to the O.P. However, to afford him one more opportunity case was adjourned to 04.06.09 even on that day also he did not bother to obey the directions given by us. On that day this Forum had strictly directed the counsel for the complainant to instruct his client to follow what was told to him by stating that he shall approach the O.P. for settlement and adjourned the case to today. At the first round, the counsel for the O.P. submitted that the complainant never approached the O.P. despite that he submitted their offer is still standing. Counsel for the complainant asked for adjournment was declined and he was told strictly to keep the complainant present as already directed, but counsel for the complainant who submitted to make submission and left the court hall has not turned up even after calling the case to 3 times thereafter. Therefore, the complainant it seems is not interest to prosecuting the case and thereby for non-cooperation of the complainant, the complaint is dismissed for non-prosecution.