Orissa

Rayagada

CC/408/2015

Manaj Kumar Choudhery - Complainant(s)

Versus

I.B.M SREI fINANCE lTD - Opp.Party(s)

Self

02 Jan 2019

ORDER

DISTRICT   CONSUMER  DISPUTES REDRESSAL    FORUM, RAYAGADA,

STATE:  ODISHA.

C.C. Case  No. 408 / 2015                               Date.    18   .    01   . 2019.

P R E S E N T .

Dr. Aswini  Kumar Mohapatra,                                   President

Sri Gadadhara Sahu,                                                    Member.

Smt.Padmalaya Mishra,.                                             Member

 

Sri Manoj  Kumar  Choudhury,  AT:Kankubadi, PS:Chindili, Dist: Rayagada.

                                                                                                                                                … Complainant.

Versus.

  1. The  Branch Manager, Srei Equipment  Finance Ltd., New Colony, Near Raghavendra College,  Rayagada.
  2. The Branch Manager, Srei Equipment  Finance Ltd.,Plot No. Y-10, Bloc EP, Sector-V,Salt Lake City, Kolkata-700091.                                                                        …Opposite parties.

For the Complainant:- Sri Sitaram Panda, Advocate, Rayagada.

For the O.Ps:- Sri Jagadananda Pattnaik,  and associates.

JUDGEMENT

 

          The  factual matrix of the case is that  the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service  against  afore mentioned O.Ps    for  imposing  over due and cheque bounced charges a sum of Rs.1,00,337.39 towards finance vehicle  JCB   3DX Backhoe loader   bearing contract  agreement  No.13202 for which  the complainant  sought for redressal of the grievances raised by the complainant.

 

Upon  Notice, the O.Ps  put in their appearance and filed written version through their learned counsel  in which  they refuting allegation made against them.  The O.Ps  taking one and another pleas in the written version   sought to dismiss the complaint as it is not maintainable  under the C.P. Act, 1986. The facts which are not specifically admitted may be treated  as denial of the O.P.  Hence the O.Ps prays the forum to dismiss the case against  them  to meet the ends of justice.

During the  course of hearing the learned counsel for the complainant  has filed a memo submitted   that the complainant has filed  the above  case against the O.Ps for  imposing  over due and cheque bounced charges a sum of Rs.1,00,337.39 towards finance vehicle  JCB   3DX Backhoe loader   bearing contract  agreement  No.13202. The  complainant further  submitted   that after filing of the C.C  case the O.Ps and the complainant  are settled the matter out  side the Forum  in presence of the gentiles .     The complainant now  need  not interested to  proceed the  case further   and  prays the forum to drop the proceedings against the O.Ps. for the  best interest of justice.

       Heard  from the parties.  Perused  the   record  and  memo  filed by the complainant.  The memo is allowed.

                Accordingly the present dispute mitigated  and the  case stands disposed  off  and O.Ps wriggled out of  liabilities & the  case closed against  them    as  the  complainant   do not want to  proceed  with  the case further against the O.Ps  after settled the matter amicably out of Forum.  Parties are left  to bear their own cost.

Dictated and corrected by me.       Pronounced on this          18  th    Day of       January, 2019.

               

                 Member.                                                            Member.                                      President

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.