NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/399/2010

SULTAN SINGH - Complainant(s)

Versus

HUDA & ANR. - Opp.Party(s)

IN PERSON

26 Mar 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 399 OF 2010
(Against the Order dated 09/10/2009 in Appeal No. 3334/2004 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. SULTAN SINGHResident of House No. 678/17, JagadhriYamuna Nagar ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. HUDA & ANR.Through its Estate OfficerJagadhri ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.C. JAIN ,PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. ANUPAM DASGUPTA ,MEMBER
For the Petitioner :NEMO
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 26 Mar 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

No one appears for the petitioner. Even then, we have considered the grounds of challenge set out in the revision petition. In our view, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, the order passed by the State Commission is emintently justified and it does not suffer from any illegality, material irregularity or jurisdictional error which calls for any interference by this Commission in exercise of revisional jurisdiction under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act. The revision petition is dismissed



......................JR.C. JAINPRESIDING MEMBER
......................ANUPAM DASGUPTAMEMBER