NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/554/2010

M/S. ROYAL MOTORS - Complainant(s)

Versus

HUDA & ANR. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. A.K. SHARMA & T.S. TOMAR

02 Mar 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 554 OF 2010
(Against the Order dated 29/10/2009 in Appeal No. 1479/2009 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. M/S. ROYAL MOTORSThrough its Proprietor Suresh Kumar Gupta, Plot No. 9, Sector-5Ballabgarh ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. HUDA & ANR.Through its Chief Administrator, Sector-6Panchkula2. THE ESTATE OFFICER/ADMINISTRATORHaryana Urban Development Authority, Sector-12,Faridabad ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.C. JAIN ,PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. ANUPAM DASGUPTA ,MEMBER
For the Petitioner :NEMO
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 02 Mar 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Heard Mr. S.K. Gupta, proprietor of the petitioner firm in person and also perused the orders passed by the fora below. In our view, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case and the settled legal position, the order passed by the State Commission is eminently justified and does not suffer from any illegality, material irregularity or jurisdictional error which calls for our interference in revision jurisdiction u/s 21 (b) of the C.P. Act, 1986. The revision petition is dismissed.



......................JR.C. JAINPRESIDING MEMBER
......................ANUPAM DASGUPTAMEMBER