NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/362/2006

SURINA & ORS - Complainant(s)

Versus

HUDA - Opp.Party(s)

MR. M.L.SHARMA & SANJAY VERMA

16 Mar 2010

ORDER

Date of Filing: 10 Feb 2006

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/362/2006
(Against the Order dated 23/08/2005 in Appeal No. 2346/2002 of the State Commission Chandigarh)
1. SURINA & ORSRESIDENTS OF 2053 MEHTA NAGAR HISSAR HARYANA ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. HUDA HISSAR HARYANA HARYANA ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. S.K. NAIK ,MEMBER
For the Appellant :MR. M.L.SHARMA & SANJAY VERMA
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 16 Mar 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Delay of 75 days in filing the revision petition is condoned.

Counsel for the petitioner does not press the present revision petition in view of judgment of Supreme Court in “U.T. Chandigarh Administration & Anr. V/s Amarjeet Singh & Ors. (2009) 4 SCC 660”.  Dismissed as withdrawn.



......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................S.K. NAIKMEMBER