Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/131/2014

Sri Bhaskar Chandra Khuntia - Complainant(s)

Versus

Housing & Urban Development Corporation LTd. (Govt. of India Enterprises), New Delhi - Opp.Party(s)

Sj. R.K Panda

19 Jun 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/131/2014
( Date of Filing : 29 Sep 2014 )
 
1. Sri Bhaskar Chandra Khuntia
S/o: Late Ramesh Ch. Khuntia, At/P.O: Pandasuni, P.S: Khantapada, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
2. Sri Dibakar Khuntia, aged 51 years
S/o. Late Ramesh Chandra Khuntia, At/P.O: Pandasuni, P.S: Khantapada, Dist: Balasore.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Housing & Urban Development Corporation LTd. (Govt. of India Enterprises), New Delhi
HUDCO Bhawan, India Habitan Centre, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003.
New Delhi
2. HUDCO NIWAS, Bhubaneswar
Housing & Urban Development Corp. Ltd., 3rd & 4th Floor, Dindayal Bhawan. Ashok Nagar, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751009.
Khurda
Odisha
3. HUDCO NIWAS, Balasore
Housing & Urban Development Corp. Ltd., Balasore, At/P.O: Balia, P.S: Sahadevkhunta, Dist: Balasore-756001.
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 19 Jun 2023
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The case record is posted today for re-hearing of the case. Neither the complainants nor their Advocate is present nor taken any step. The Ops are also absent. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of both the parties. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up.   

                                         In the present case, Ops are appeared and filed written version. As it appears from the case record, the complainants remained absent and slept over the matter since 19.07.2017 and no step is taken nor did their advocate take any step on their behalf. From the above nature and conduct of the complainants, it is clearly made out that the complainants have no interest to proceed with the case further, for which valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and the nature and conduct of the complainants, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainants should be dismissed.                        

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainants is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed earlier against the Ops shall remain infructuous.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.