Uttar Pradesh

StateCommission

A/2013/757

Nitin Pratap Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Housing Development & Finance Corporation - Opp.Party(s)

U K Srivastava

15 Apr 2024

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UP
C-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010
 
First Appeal No. A/2013/757
( Date of Filing : 10 Apr 2013 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)
 
1. Nitin Pratap Singh
a
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Housing Development & Finance Corporation
a
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SUSHIL KUMAR PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. SUDHA UPADHYAY MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 15 Apr 2024
Final Order / Judgement

ORAL

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

U.P. Lucknow.

Appeal No. 757 of 2013

Shri Nitin Pratap Singh s/o Shri Surendra Singh

& Alpana Singh w/o Nitin  Pratap Singh,

R/o Gaur Green Avenue, Abhay Khand-II,

Indrapuram, Ghaziabad.                                     …Appellant.

Versus

1- Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd.,

    Redg. Office at Raman House, H.T. Parekh Marg,

    169, Backbay Reclamation, Church Gate,

    Mumbai-400020

2- Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd.,

    Northern Regional Office at the Capital Court,

    Munirka, Olof Palme Marg, New Delhi.   .…Respondents.

Present:-

1- Hon’ble Sri Sushil Kumar, Presiding Member.

2- Hon’ble Smt. Sudha Upadyay, Member.

None for the appellant.

Sri Vikas Agarwal, Advocate for the respondents.

Date  15.4.2024

JUDGMENT

Per Sri Sushil Kumar,  Member-   This appeal has been directed against the judgment and order dated 8.3.2013 passed by the Ld. District Commission, Ghaziabad in complaint case no.87 of 2012 whereby the ld. District Commission has dismissed the complaint on the ground that in this regard a civil suit is pending before the Civil Court and further it is also find out that the nature of the complaint is criminal nature. Therefore, the same is not maintainable.

          The findings of the ld. District Commission is according to the pleadings of the parties hence, no interference is  required. The appeal deserves to be dismissed.    

 

 

ORDER

          Appeal is dismissed.

The stenographer is requested to upload this order on the Website of this Commission today itself. 

          Certified copy of this judgment be provided to the parties as per rules.        

 

          (Sudha Upadhyay)                          (Sushil Kumar)                             

                Member                                  Presiding Member

Jafri, PA I

Court 3

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SUSHIL KUMAR]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SUDHA UPADHYAY]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.