The petitioner has sent a letter to either adjourn the case or to decide the revision petition, which is self explanatory.  We have gone through the entire record. The District Forum had vide order dated 1.10.2003 issued following directions to the respondents who were directed  to comply with the same within 30 days.  The said directions are as under :-

“(i) To issue No Demand Certificate to the   complainant.

  (ii) To pay Rs.500/- as compensation for harassment and mental agony caused to him.

  (iii) To pay Rs.500/- as costs of proceedings.”

          This order was challenged by opposite party before the State Commission by filing appeal and the appeal was dismissed.  The petitioner had not filed any appeal against the order of the District Forum.  The petitioner has now come in revision seeking appropriate action against the officers of the Board, who according to him had furnished intentionally false evidence by way affidavit and the complainant be compensated by way of compensation to be realized  from the officer concerned for dragging the complainant for a period of six years on false and baseless ground.  Petitioner now claims compensation of Rs.2 lakhs.  If the petitioner had any grievance in relation to the false affidavit, he should have taken up the same before the District Forum or State Commission, but the same cannot be entertained in the revision.  In view of the above, we do not find any ground whatsoever for entertaining this revision and the revision is, accordingly, dismissed with no order as to costs.