Haryana

Karnal

93/2012

Varun Taneja S/o Arjun Taneja - Complainant(s)

Versus

Hotline Communicatioons 6/79., 2 Nokia india Pvt Ltd., 3 shri nath Ji Communication - Opp.Party(s)

Sh.M.K. Sharma

28 Aug 2014

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. 93/2012
 
1. Varun Taneja S/o Arjun Taneja
H.No. 178 Sec-8 Karnal
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Hotline Communicatioons 6/79., 2 Nokia india Pvt Ltd., 3 shri nath Ji Communication
W.E.A. Gurudware Road Karol Bag New Delhi., 2 12th Flower Kailash Building Kasturba Gandhi marg New Delhi., 3 Nokia Service Centre Nehru Place Shop No-8 Karnal
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Subhash Goyal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. Shashi Sharma MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.

 

                                                          Complaint No.093of 2012                                                                                  

                                                          Date of instt.14.02.2012

                                                          Date of decision: 11.02.2015

 

Varun Taneja son of Arjun Taneja resident of Bagh New Delhi at present resident of House No.178 , Sec 8, Urban Estate, Karnal.                                 .                 

                                                                 ………Complainant.

                                                Vs.

  1. Hotline Communication 6/79, W.E.A. Gurudwara Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi Marg though its owner.
  2. Nokia India Pvt. Ltd. Flat No. 1204, 12th Floor, Kailalsh Building kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi thought its Managing Director.
  3.  Shri Nath Ji Communications, Nokia Service Centre, Nehru Place, Shop No.8, Karnal though its owner.

                                  ………Opposite Parties.

 

                   Complaint U/s 12 of the Consumer

                   Protection Act.

 

Before          Sh.Subhash Goyal……. President.

 

 Present        None for the complainant.

                   Sh. Amish Goel, Advocate for Op No.3.

                   Op No.1 And 2 ex parte.

ORDER:

         

                   The case called several times since morning. None has appeared on behalf of the complainant. It is already 4.00 PM. Further wait is not justified. Therefore, the present complaint is dismissed in default. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.  

Announced:

11.02.2015.                                                                                                                                                     

                                                          (Subhash Goyal)

                                                             President,

                                                         District Consumer Disputes

                                                          Redressal Forum, Karnal.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Subhash Goyal]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MS. Shashi Sharma]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.