Delhi

West Delhi

CC/16/54

Jaspal - Complainant(s)

Versus

Honey Builders Devolopers - Opp.Party(s)

25 May 2017

ORDER

                   CC-54/16                               D.O.O- 25.05.2017

Present :-          Shri W.S. Tuteja A/R and husbandof complainant.

JASPAL VS HONEY BUILDERS DEVOLOPERS

                   Counsel for OP.

          Complainant failed to file evidence. Learned counsel for opposite party submitted that as per para no.2 of the agreement of collaboration between the parties total price of the property is Rs.40,00,000/-( Rs. FortyLacs only). He further argued that this forum has no pecuniary jurisdiction to try the complaint. Shri W.S. Tuteja A/R and husband of the complainant also admitted Rs.40,00,000/-( Rs. Forty Lacs only) price of the property.

Hon’ble National Commission in order dated 07.10.2016 passed in appeal no.644/2015 titled ParikshitParashar V/S M/S Universal BuildwellPvt.Ltd. and othersheld thattotal value of the flat is to be seenfor the purpose of pecuniary jurisdiction.

          Therefore, in view of law laid down by the Hon’ble National Commission inParikshitParashar’s case (supra) this forum has not pecuniary jurisdiction to decide this complaint.

          Therefore, complaint is returned to the complainant for presentation before the competent forum of jurisdiction. File be consigned to record room.

                   

.              

                        (PUNEET LAMBA)                                                              ( R.S.  BAGRI )

                                   MEMBER                                                                  PRESIDENT

                                25.05.2017                                                                            25.05.2017