NCDRC

NCDRC

OP/163/2001

MR. S.K. PONNUSWAMY - Complainant(s)

Versus

HOECHST ROUSSEL VET P. LTD. & ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. NIKHIL NAYYAR

19 Mar 2010

ORDER

Date of Filing: 31 May 2001

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHICONSUMER CASE NO. No. OP/163/2001
1. MR. S.K. PONNUSWAMYS/O SH. R. KALIANNANTHURAIYUR MAIN ROAD ERUMAPATI POST NAMAKKAL ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. HOECHST ROUSSEL VET P. LTD. & ORS.NEETA PARK AIRPORT ROADYERWADA PUNE - 411006 ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. GUPTA ,PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. BATTA ,MEMBER
For the Appellant :NEMO
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 19 Mar 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Shri Ghosh points out that pursuant to the order dated 27.11.2009, the complainant has not served the interrogatories for being answered by the opposite parties. No one is even represented on behalf of the complainant. Complaint is, therefore dismissed for non-prosecution.


......................JK.S. GUPTAPRESIDING MEMBER
......................JR.K. BATTAMEMBER