| Complaint Case No. CC/235/2022 | | ( Date of Filing : 12 Aug 2022 ) |
| | | | 1. Parveen Sharma | | S/o Sh. Dharam Chand, aged about 36 years R/o Des Raj Colony, Near Mahaluxmi Furnishing & Jain Chakki, Dr. Malik Wali Gali, Panipat prop. of M/s Nishtha Fabrics. |
| ...........Complainant(s) | |
| Versus | | 1. Hitachi India Pvt. Ltd. | | Branch office 508, Ascot Centre, Next to Hilton Hotel, Sahar Road, Andheri (East), Mumbai-400099, India, through its signatory/authorized person. | | 2. New Bhagwati Enterprises | | Authorized Service Center of Daikin Hitachi, situated at 1114, Bishan Saroop Colony, Panipat-132103, Haryana, through its authorized person/Prop. | | 3. M/s Choudtail India Pvt. Ltd. | | Situated at Khasra no. 58//12/2/2/2min, 19min, 20/2, 21/1, 21/2, 21/3, 57/23/2, 24, 25, 63//3/1/1, 4/1, 5/1, Bilaspur, Adjoining Ansal, Pioneer City, Gurugram-122413, Haryana, through its Authorized p |
| ............Opp.Party(s) |
|
|
| Final Order / Judgement | No evidence of complainant is present. A date is requested on behalf of the complainant, which is opposed. Heard. This case is continuing for evidence of the complainant from 19.01.2024. No effort has been made by the complainant to produce the evidence. Moreso, the complainant has already availed four effective opportunities including last opportunity. Hence, there is no sufficient grounds for adjourning this case for the purpose of the evidence of the complainant. Hence, the evidence of the complainant is hereby closed by order of this Commission. 2. This complaint has been filed against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite parties. In written statement, all the allegations have been denied by the opposite parties and dismissal of the complaint was prayed for. 3. As the complainant has come before this Commission for seeking relief, the onus was on the complainant to prove his case by adducing cogent and convincing evidence. Since the complainant has not produced any evidence on record despite several effective opportunities as stated above and hence, there is no iota of evidence on record to substantiate the allegations of the complaint. Hence, the present complaint is hereby dismissed in lacking of evidence. However, both the parties are left to bear their own costs. 4. This order be communicated to the parties free of costs and file be consigned to the record-room. | |
