West Bengal

Howrah

CC/14/289

MD. SAHID ALIAS SAHID - Complainant(s)

Versus

Hitachi Home & Life Solutions (India) Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

30 Oct 2015

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HOWRAH
20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah 711 101.
Office (033) 2638 0892, Confonet (033) 2638 0512 Fax (033) 2638 0892
 
Complaint Case No. CC/14/289
 
1. MD. SAHID ALIAS SAHID
S/O Md. Hanif, Swapna Khuti Andul Road, P.O. Podrah
Howrah 711 109
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Hitachi Home & Life Solutions (India) Ltd.
Situated at A-15, Mohan Co-operative Industrial Estate, Mathur Road, New Delhi,110001 also at 9B Poonam Building 9th fl. Russel Street, Kolkata 700 071 also 37&38 Mohinath Porel Lane Salkia Howrah 711 106
2. Great Eastern Appliances Pvt. Ltd.
290, G.T. Road, Howrah
Howrah 711 102
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Shri Bhim Das Nanda PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Jhumki Saha MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Asim Kumar Phatak MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

DATE OF FILING                    :     16..05.2014.

DATE OF S/R                            :      23.07.2014.

DATE OF FINAL ORDER      :     30.10.2015.

Md. Sahid alias Sahid,  

son  of Md. Hanif,  

residing at Swapna Khuti, Andul Road, P.O. Padrah,

District Howrah,

Pin 711109.………………………………………………….. COMPLAINANT.

 

  • Versus   -

 

1.         Hitachi Home & Life Solutions ( India ) Ltd.,  

situated at  A 15, Mohan Co operative Industrial Estate,

Mathur Road, New Delhi 1100001,

also at 9B, Poonam Building, 9th floor, Russel Street,

Kolkata 700071,

also 37 & 38, Mohinath Porel Lane, Salkia,

Howrah 711106.

 

2.         Great Eastern Appliances Pvt. Ltd.,

             290,  G.T. Road,

Howrah 711102……………………………………………OPPOSITE PARTIES.

 P    R    E     S    E    N     T

Hon’ble President  :   Shri  B. D.  Nanda,  M.A. ( double ), L.L.M., WBHJS.

Hon’ble Member      :      Smt. Jhumki Saha.

Hon’ble Member : Shri A.K. Pathak.

F   I   N   A    L       O   R   D    E     R

  1. Complainant, Md. Sahid alias Sahid,   by filing a petition U/S 12 of the C. P. Act, 1986 ( as amended up to date ) has prayed for a direction to be given upon the o.ps. to replace the A.C. Machine in question ( out of two machines )  along with Rs. 1,50,000/- as compensation and Rs. 10,000/- as litigation costs together with other reliefs as the Forum may  deem fit and proper. 
  1. Brief fact of the case is that complainant purchased two 1.5 ton Split A.C. Machines amounting to Rs. 84,000/-, one Samsung 28” L.E.D. amounting to Rs. 23,700/- and one Sharp L.E.D. T.V. amounting to Rs. 23,500/- totaling Rs. 1,31,200/-, out of which complainant paid Rs. 44,872/- and the rest amount was financed on an EMI of Rs.  10,934/- each X 8 vides Annexures dated 14.02.2014 and 18.02.2014 i.e., P/1 collectively.  At the time of installation of A.C. Machine, the men of the o.p. no. 2 charged Rs. 14,800/- illogically and arbitrarily from the complainant. Since installation one of the A.C. Machine was completely out of order and for which  complainant informed the o.p. no. 2 but the o.p. no. 2 did not pay any heed. After lapse of few days complainant lodged a complaint at the office of the o.p. no. 2 but no positive step had been taken. Thereafter complainant sent lawyer’s notice dated 17.04.2014  at the office of the o.p. nos. 1 & 2 but o.ps. remained silent vide Annexures P/2 collectively. Subsequently on 2nd May, 2014 complainant contacted o.p. no. 2 over phone  about non cooperation. After receiving the complaint, the personnel of o.p. no. 2 visited on 29.04.2014 and replaced the defective A.C. Machine but within a short period the machine became inoperative. Complainant repeatedly informed the o.ps. but all his efforts went in vain.  Being frustrated and finding no other alternatives the complainant has filed this instant petition with the aforesaid prayers.
  1. Notices were  served upon o.ps. O.P. no. 2  appeared and filed  written version but o.p. no. 1 neither appeared nor filed any written version.  Accordingly, case heard on contest against o.p. no. 2 and ex parte against o.p. no. 1.  
  1. Upon pleadings of   parties two points arose for determination :

 

i)          Is there any deficiency in service on the part of the O.Ps.  ?

  1. Whether the complainant is  entitled to get any relief as prayed for ? 

DECISION  WITH   REASONS      :

                  Both the points are  taken up together for consideration.  We have carefully gone through the written versions filed by o.p. no. 2  and noted its  contents. Denying  and disputing  the allegations of the complainant made out in the complaint petition, o.p. no. 2 has taken a specific plea that in case of a dispute with respect to a defective electric goods, complainant was required to produce expert evidence.  But no such expert evidence has been filed by the complainant. Moreover, the  A.C. machine in question has been purchased in the name of ‘DHAHID’ and not in the name of the complainant ‘Md. Sahid’. So the instant petition is not maintainable. But on scrutiny of the Annexure P/1 we filed all the money receipt dated 14.02.2014 and 18.02.2014 are lying in the name of Md. Sahid who is the petitioner of this instant case. It is also acknowledged by the complainant that after making the initial complaint dated 17.04.2014, o.p. no. 2 replaced the  A.C. machine in question on 29.04.2014 wherefrom it is crystal clear that the defect of the A.C. Machine was accepted by the o.p. no. 2. And the replaced one again started giving trouble which was also informed on 2nd May, 2014 vide complaint no. 14050200293. But o.ps. remained silent without doing the needful. Moreover, the o.p. no. 1 has not cared to appear before the Forum even after receiving summons. No W/V has been filed by them which clearly shows that they have nothing to put forward in their favour. And the complaint petition remains unchallenged and uncontroverted against o.p. no. 1. O.ps. have miserably failed   to keep promise made by way of providing warranty, which certainly amounts to deficiency in  service coupled with unfair trade practice  on their  part which should not be allowed to be perpetuated for an indefinite period.   And we are of the candid opinion that it is a fit case where the prayers of the complainant  should be allowed. Points under consideration are accordingly decided.

      Hence,

                                                                         O     R     D      E      R      E        D

      That the C. C. Case No. 289 of 2014 ( HDF 289 of 2014 )  be  allowed on contest    with  costs  against  the O.P. no. 2  and  ex parte against O.P. no. 1.

        That the  O.P. nos.  1 & 2  are jointly and severally    directed to replace the A.C. Machine in question with the same model, if not available,  with a higher model  to the complainant along with fresh warranty  within one month from the date of this order i.d., Rs. 50/- per day shall be imposed till actual replacement and complainant is also directed to return the A.C. Machine in question.

       That O.P. nos.  1 & 2 jointly and severally be  further  directed to pay Rs. 3,000/- as compensation and Rs. 2,000/- as litigations costs to the complainant within one month from this order i.d., the entire awarded  amount of  Rs. 5,000/- shall carry an interest @ 9% per annum till full realization.         The complainant is at liberty to put the final order  into execution after expiry of the appeal period.

     Supply the copies of the order to the parties, as per rule.            

DICTATED  &    CORRECTED

BY   ME.  

                                                                   

  (    Jhumki Saha)                                              

  Member, C.D.R.F., Howrah.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Shri Bhim Das Nanda]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Jhumki Saha]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. Asim Kumar Phatak]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.