Haryana

Ambala

CC/187/2022

Smt Veena Goel - Complainant(s)

Versus

Hitachi Complex - Opp.Party(s)

16 Dec 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AMBALA.

 

                                                          Complaint case no.         :        187 of 2022.

                                                          Date of Institution           :        06.06.2022.

                                                          Date of decision    :        16.12.2022.

 

     Smt. Veena Goel wife of Late Shri Krishan Gopal, resident of 1797/3, New Mahavir     Nagar, Ambala City, Haryana, PIN 134003, Shop No.11, Pili Kothi, Ambala City,    through authorized person Shri Manish Goel (son), son of Shri Krishan Gopal.

 

          ……. Complainant.

 

                                                Versus

 

     1.       Hitachi Complex, Karan Nagar, Kadi, District Mehsana-382727, Gujarat, India,        through its Director.

     2.       Hitachi Complex, 9^th Floor, Abhijeet-1, Mithakhali Six, Road, Ahmedabad-                       380006, Gujarat, India through its Manager.

     3.       Hitachi New Friends Refrigeration (Service Agency of Hitachi) SCO 47, Opp.           Peer Bal Bhawan Road, New HDFC Bank, Ambala Haryana-134003, through its               owner.

     4.       Hitachi New Friends Refrigeration (Service Agency of Hitachi) SCO 47, Opp.           Peer Bal Bhawan Road, New HDFC Bank, Ambala Haryana-134003, through its               Service Engineer Shri Gagan Saini.

     5.       M/s Arvind Electrical & Electronics, 457/7, Prem Nagar, Ambala City, through             its Proprietor/Owner/Authorized Signatory, Pin Code-134003.

                                                                                       ….…. Opposite Parties.

         

Before:        Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.

                   Smt. Ruby Sharma, Member.

                   Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma, Member.         

                            

Present:       Shri Manish Goel, Authorized representative of the complainant.      

          OP No.1,3 to 5 already ex parte.          

           Shri Rajeev Sachdeva, Advocate, counsel for the OP No.2.

           

          Complaint under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019

 

Order by:-  Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.

 

                   Today, the case was fixed in the Lok Adalat.  Learned counsel for the OP No.2 has suffered a statement, which is recorded separately, to the effect that matter has been compromised between the parties and as per compromise, OP No.2 is ready to pay Rs.37,000/-, within 40 days, subject to return of old AC/Unit with accessories.  Authorized representative of the complainant has also suffered a statement that he has heard the statement given by the learned counsel for the OP No.2 and agrees with the same and he does not want to pursue the present complaint and withdraws the same.      

           In view of the statement suffered by the learned counsel for the OP No.2 and the authorized representative of the complainant, the present complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that parties shall remain bound by their statements. Certified copy of this order passed in Lok Adalat be supplied to the parties concerned, free of costs, as per rules. File be indexed and consigned to record room, after due compliance.

Announced on: 16.12.2022. 

 

          Member                          Member                                   President