Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/54/2018

Viswanath Subramaniam - Complainant(s)

Versus

Hiranandani Palace Garderns Pvt Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

-

09 Sep 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

C.C. No.54/2018

                         DATED THE 09^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021

 

 

1.Mr. Viswanath Subramaniam,

No.29, Ackerman Street,

Salem.

NH 03079, USA.

Represented by his Authorized Agent/ person

Mrs. Rema Balasundaram,

Block:8-TA, Jains Kences,

No.15, Reddy Street,

Virugambakkam,

Chennai – 600 092.                                                                                      .. Complainant.

 

-Versus-

1. Hiranandani Palace Gardens (P) Ltd.,

UNIT – of M/S HIRCO,

Represented by its Managing Director,

6^th Floor, Sigma Buildings,

Hiranandani Gardens,

Powai,

Mumbai – 400 076.      

 

Hiradani Palace Gardens-Chennai,

At Triveni Nagar,

Umayalparamancheri,

Chennai – 603 204. (Defunt)

 

2. Mr. Niranjan Hiranandani,

In the capacity of Director and

In personal capacity,

M/s. Hiranandani Palace Gardens (P) Ltd.,

6^th Floor, Sigma Buildings,

Hiranandani Gardens,

Powai,

Mumbai – 400 076.

 

3. Mr. Kersi Minocher Gherda,

In the capacity of Director and

In personal capacity,

M/s. Hiranandani Palace Gardens (P) Ltd.,

6^th Floor, Sigma Buildings,

Hiranandani Gardens,

Powai,

Mumbai – 400 076.

 

4. Mr. Prashant Ramesh Thanwala,

In the capacity of Director and

In personal capacity,

M/s. Hiranandani Palace Gardens (P) Ltd.,

6^th Floor, Sigma Buildings,

Hiranandani Gardens,

Powai,

Mumbai – 400 076.

 

5. Mr. Vasudevan Suresh,

In the capacity of Director and

In personal capacity,

M/s. Hiranandani Palace Gardens (P) Ltd.,

6^th Floor, Sigma Buildings,

Hiranandani Gardens,

Powai,

Mumbai – 400 076.                                                                     .. Opposite Parties.

 

Counsel for the complainant              : M/s. R. Udayakumar

Opposite parties                                 :

 

          This consumer complaint coming up before us on 09.09.2021 for appearance of complainant and for reporting settlement or for dismissal and this Commission made the following order in open court:                                                      

 

Docket order

 

            No representation for complainant. The complaint is posted today for appearance of complainant and for reporting settlement or for dismissal.  When the matter was called today at 10.30 A.M., the complainant was not present and it is passed over and again called at 12.40 P.M.  but the complainant not present.  Sufficient time granted since the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

            Hence, the complaint is dismissed for non-prosecution.  No cost.

 

                    Sd/-                                                                                      Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                           R.SUBBIAH                        

          MEMBER                                                                                           PRESIDENT