| First Appeal No. A/205/2018 | | ( Date of Filing : 05 Mar 2018 ) | | (Arisen out of Order Dated 24/01/2018 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/178/2017 of District Kolkata-II(Central)) |
| | | | 1. Computer Gallery Services | | 6, Chittaranjan Avenue, 2nd Floor, E-Mall, Shop no. 216, Kolkata - 700 072, P.S. - Bowbazar. |
| ...........Appellant(s) | |
| Versus | | 1. Hirak Jyoti Mondal | | 521, Nibedita Park near Bandel Church, Hooghly, Pin - 712 103. | | 2. Infocus(Regional Head office Kolkata) Accel Front Line Global Services | | 21, Lower Rawdon Street, 1st Floor, near Minto Park, P.S. - Shakespeare Sarani, Kolkata - 700 017. | | 3. VRP Telematics Pvt. Ltd. Telan GKE Pvt. Ltd. | | S.No. 211/A, 212/A, 212/B, Gundia Pocham Pally Village, Medchal Road, Ayodhya X Roads, Ranga Reddy Dist., City - Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh - 500 014. | | 4. M/s. Innocom Electronic India Pvt. Ltd. | | Unit no. 1202/1204, 12th Floor, JMD Megapolis, Sector - 48, Sohna Road, Gurgaon, Haryana- 122 048. |
| ...........Respondent(s) |
|
|
| Final Order / Judgement | Sri Utpal Kumar Bhattacharya, Member This is an Appeal u/s 15 of the C.P Act, 1986 filed by the Appellant/OP challenging the judgment and order dated 24.01.2018 passed by the Ld. District Forum in Complaint Case No. CC/178/2017 allowing the complaint on contest with directions upon the O.Ps in the Complaint Case to pay the price of the Mobile, costs and compensations to the tunes of Rs. 10,999/-, 5000/- and 5,000/- respectively. Both sides were present before the Bench. Ld. Advocate appearing on behalf of the Appellant/OP submitted that the dispute has been amicably settled through compliance of the directions passed by the Ld. District Forum in the impugned judgment and order. As contended, the Respondent/Complainant also received the payment with satisfaction. Hence, as he submitted, the Appeal did not lie and the same was not required to be proceeded with. The Respondent/Complainant who was present in person assented to the above submission of the Appellant/OP. In view of the above, we do not find the necessity of the case to be proceeded with any longer. Hence, ORDERED that the Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. | |
