Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/102/2012

M. SIVAHARI - Complainant(s)

Versus

HINDUSTHAN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, THE CHAIRMAN - Opp.Party(s)

P. SELVARAJ

22 Nov 2021

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/102/2012
( Date of Filing : 05 Oct 2012 )
 
1. M. SIVAHARI
IYYAPPANKOIL STREET, PATTIVEERAN PATTI, BATLAGUNDU TALUK, DINDUGAL DISTRICT
2. HINDUSTHAN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, THE PRINCIPAL
OTHAKKALMANDAPAM POST, COIMBATORE-32
COIMBATORE
TAMILNADU
3. KARPAGA VINAYAGA DENTAL COLLEGE, THE DEAN
CHINNAKOLAAMBAKKAM, KANCHIPURAM DISTRICT
KANCHEEPURAM
TAMILNADU
4. THE SECRETARY, SELECTION COMMITTEE
DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, KILPAUK, CHENNAI-600 010
CHENNAI
TAMILNADU
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. HINDUSTHAN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, THE CHAIRMAN
OTHAKKALMANDAPAM POST, COIMBATORE-32
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 22 Nov 2021
Final Order / Judgement

N THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                     BEFORE   HON’BLE THIRU. JUSTICE. R. SUBBIAH                  ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                        Tmt.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                               ::      MEMBER

 

CC. No. 102/2012

                                                             DATED THIS THE 22nd  DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021

 

M.Sivahari,

S/o Murugesan,

Iyyappankoil street,

Pattiveeran patti, Batlagundu Taluk,

Dindugal District                                                                            ..complainant

                                Vs

1.The Chairman,

Hindusthan College of Engineering and Technology,

Othakkalmandapam post,

Coimbatore  - 32

 

2. The Principal,  

Hindusthan College of Engineering and Technology,

Othakkalmandapam post,

Coimbatore  - 32

 

3. The Dean,

Karpaga Vinayaga Dental college,

Chinnakolaambakkam,

Kanchipuram District

 

4. The Secretary,

Selection Committee,

Director of Medical Education,

Kilpauk,

Chennai – 600 010                                                                              ..opposite parties

 

Counsel for complainant                             : M/s P.Selvaraj

Counsel for opposite parties   1 and 2          : M/s Ramesh Raj

Counsel for 3rd opposite party                     : M/s Udaya kumar

4th opposite party                                      : Served called absent

 

          This complaint coming before us for hearing today before this Commission, this commission made the following order in open court :-

             

                                                DOCKET ORDER

      

      No representation for complainant and opposite parties. When this matter was called at 10.30 a.m, there was no representation for complainant, hence the matter was passed over and again called at 12.30 noon, the complainant was again not present. Since the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case, the complaint is dismissed for default. No cost.

 

        Sd/-                                                                                                            Sd/-

S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                                                                         R. SUBBIAH             

          MEMBER                                                                                            PRESIDENT

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.