View 82 Cases Against Wellness
YASHVARDHAN CHHABRA filed a consumer case on 30 Jul 2024 against HINDUSTAN WELLNESS in the North Consumer Court. The case no is CC/105/2021 and the judgment uploaded on 08 Aug 2024.
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I (North District)
[Govt. of NCT of Delhi]
Ground Floor, Court Annexe -2 Building, Tis Hazari Court Complex, Delhi- 110054
Phone: 011-23969372; 011-23912675 Email: confo-nt-dl@nic.in
Consumer Complaint No:105/2021
IN THE MATTER OF:
Sh. Yashvardhan Chhabra
3B/45, Mall Road,
New Delhi-110054. … Complainant
Vs
Hindustan Wellness
Plot No.107, Sector-44,
Gurugram-122003 … Opposite Party
ORDER
30/07/2024
Ashwani Kumar Mehta, Member:
1. The present complaint has been filed under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. The brief details of facts, as alleged by the Complainant in the Complaint in hand, are that:-
2. It has been alleged that this dispute clearly indicates that there was negligence on the OP and the said OP is running an unfair trade practice in order to dupe the hard eared money of the Complainant wherein OP has intentionally provided the de novo dreadful and deceitful service to the Complainant and has not provided the proper services which has caused unnecessary agony and stress despite the Complainant has paid full amount to the OP. Therefore, the complaint has been filed praying for directions to the OP to:-
3. The Complainant has also filed copies of legal notice dated 22.05.2021 sent to the OP, booking confirmation emails, test reports and communications/emails exchanged between the parties.
4. Accordingly, notice was issued to the OP to defend the complaint before the commission but the OP neither appeared nor did send any communication despite service of the notice. Since the OP has chosen not to contest the allegations levelled in the complaint despite service and has been proceeded Ex-parte, the allegations made by the Complainant have remained un-rebutted.
5. The complainant has filed evidence by way of Affidavit. Therefore, the complaint has been examined on the basis of the documents/evidences and material available on records. Since the OP has chosen not to contest the allegations levelled in the complaint despite service, it is considered as deemed acceptance of the allegations of deficiency of service and harassment to the complainant by the OP. However, the material available on the record is sufficient to corroborate that the complainant has suffered directly due to deficient service on the part of the OP in terms of the deficiency defined in the Act which includes any fault, imperfection, shortcoming or inadequacy in the quality, nature and manner of performance which is required to be maintained in relation to any service and includes any act of negligence or omission or commission by such person which causes loss or injury to the consumer. Therefore, we feel appropriate to direct the OP to pay the Complainant:-
6. It is clarified that the aforesaid amount shall be paid by the OP within 30 days as directed above at para 5 (i) & (ii). In case, the abovesaid amount is not paid by the OP to the Complainant within the period as directed above, the OP shall be liable to pay interest @12% per annum on the entire awarded amount from the date of expiry of 30 days period.
8. Order be given dasti to the parties in accordance with rules. Order be also uploaded on the website. Thereafter, file be consigned to the record room.
ASHWANI KUMAR MEHTA HARPREET KAUR CHARYA
Member Member
DCDRC-1 (North) DCDRC-1 (North)
DIVYA JYOTI JAIPURIAR
President
DCDRC-1 (North)
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.