Punjab

Bhatinda

CC/09/289

Ranju Goyal - Complainant(s)

Versus

Hindtel Communications - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Pardeep Goyal Advocate

12 Nov 2009

ORDER


District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bathinda (Punjab)
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Govt. House No. 16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence, Bathinda-151 001
consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/289

Ranju Goyal
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

Hindtel Communications
J.D.Enterprises,
Nokia India Pvt Ltd
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:


Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Statement of Sh.Sukhdev Mittal,counsel for the opposite party No.2. Stated that opposite party No.2 is ready to make the payment of Rs.4,500/- (Rupees FourThousand and Five Hundred Only) for mobile set in question which was purchased on 29.11.2008 within 30 days from today against original job sheet. The amount will be deposit in the shape of cheque in the Forum in the name of complainant. RO&AC Member Member President, D.C.F. 12.11.09. Statement of Sh.Pardeep Sharma,counsel for the complainant W.O. Stated that I accept the offer of opposite party No.2 as stated by Sh.Sukhdev Milttal,counsel for opposite party No.2, on behalf of the complainant. In view of the statement of Sh.Sukhdev Mittal, I may kindly be allow to withdraw the complaint. I shall handover the original job sheet to opposite party No.2 through their counsel at same time. RO&AC Member Member President, D.C.F. 12.11.09 12.11.09 Present: Sh.Pardeep Sharma,counsel for the complainant. Sh.Sukhdev Mittal,counsel for opposite party No.2. Sh.Sanjay Goyal,counsel for opposite party No.1. Sh.Sukhraj Singh,counsel for opposite party No.3. Counsel for the opposite party No.2 and complainant have made the above statements, they are bound by their statements. In view of statements of the complainant and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. The opposite party No.2 is directed to deposit the amount Rs.4,500/- in the shape of cheque in this Forum on or before 11.12.09 and complainant is directed to handover the original job sheet to opposite party No.2 at the same time. File be consigned. Member Member President, D.C.F.