Punjab

Bhatinda

CC/08/132

Pankaj Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Hind Tel Communication - Opp.Party(s)

In person.

09 Jul 2008

ORDER


District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bathinda (Punjab)
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Govt. House No. 16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence, Bathinda-151 001
consumer case(CC) No. CC/08/132

Pankaj Kumar
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

Hind Tel Communication
Neuron Technologies,Hanuman Chowk
Nokia India Private Limited
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:


Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Statement of Sh.Mahesh Singla,son of Sh.Hem Raj Singla,aged 25 years, VPO Jathoke, Teh.& Distt.Bathinda authorised representative of opposite party No.1 on oath. I am authorised representative of opposite party No.1 and as such, I am competent to make statement on its behalf. I offer mobile handset made Nokia N-70 M IMEI No.351863010417489 to the complainant. The set is repaired one. Opposite party No.1 undertakes to extend the period of warranty on this set till 8.1.2009 as per terms and conditions of the warranty for such set. RO&AC Member President, D.C.F. Statement of Sh.Pankaj Kumar son of Sh.Mohan Lal,aged 25 years Resident of H.No.33322, St.No.6,Partap Nagar,Bathilnda on oath. I have heard the statement of Sh.Mahesh Singla,authorised representative of opposite party No.1. I accept the Mobile handset offered by opposite party No.1. Since,opposite party No.1 have given the above undertaking. I do not want to proceed with this complaint at this stage. It may be dismissed as withdrawn. RO&AC Member President, D.C.F. 9.7.08 Present: Complainant in person. Sh.Mahesh Singla,authorised representative of opposite party No.1 in person. Sh.Sukhdev Mittal,counsel for opposite party No.3. Opposite party No.2 already exparte. Sh.Mahesh Singla,authorised representative of opposite party No.1 and Sh.Pankaj kumar complainant have made the statements. They will be bound by them. In view of the statement made by Sh.Pankaj Kumar, complainant, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Parties are left to bear their own costs. File be consigned. Member President, D.C.F.