Chandigarh

DF-I

CC/441/2010

Pulkit P. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Himalaya - Opp.Party(s)

06 Aug 2010

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 441 of 2010
1. Pulkit P.R/o House No. 17 Block-118 ITBP Sector-32/A Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. HimalayaPhoto Service SCO 1032-33 Sector-22/B Chandigarh2. M/s Mobile Connect SCO No. 2433-34 Sector-22/C, Chandigarh ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 06 Aug 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I                                                  U.T. CHANDIGARH

                                                                         

Complaint Case No. 441 of 2010

 

Pulkit P. resident of House No.17, Block 118, ITBP, Sector 32-A, Chandigarh.                                                                                                                             --- Complainant

                                    Versus           

 

1.         Himalaya Photo Service, SCO 1032-33, Sector 22-B, Chandigarh.

2.         M/s Mobile Connect, SCO No.2433-34, Sector 22-C, Chandigarh.                                                                                                                                                  ---Opposite Parties

           

 Present:          None for the Complainant.                

                       

                                                            ORDER

 

                        The case is at preliminary stage. The case called out several times but neither the complainant nor anybody else on his behalf has turned up. Same was the position on the last date of hearing. The complainant was directed to produce the mobile set in question for inspection whether the same has any defect, but he did not turn up either to pursue his case or to produce the mobile set. It appears that the complaint filed by the complainant is fake. The complaint is accordingly dismissed for default of apperance.

                        Certified copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.

 

06.08.2010   (MADANJIT KAUR SAHOTA)      (RAJINDER SINGH GILL)       (JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL)

                          MEMBER                                           MEMBER                                                       PRESIDENT                                   

 


MR. RAJINDER SINGH GILL, MEMBERHONABLE MR. JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL, PRESIDENT DR. MRS MADANJIT KAUR SAHOTA, MEMBER