View 2335 Cases Against Canara Bank
View 2335 Cases Against Canara Bank
CANARA BANK AND OTHERS filed a consumer case on 10 Dec 2019 against HEMLATA in the StateCommission Consumer Court. The case no is RP/98/2019 and the judgment uploaded on 06 Jan 2020.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA
Revision Petition No.98 of 2019
Date of Institution:03.12.2019
Date of Decision:09.12.2019
Canara Bank, Hasanpur, Sub-Tehsil Hassanpur, Tehsil Hodal, District Palwal through its Branch Manager/Authorized Signatory.
…..Revisionist.
Versus
1. Hemlata widow of Shri Suresh, R/o House No.107, near Ramleela Maidan, Ward No.6, Hasanpur, Sub-Tehsil Hasanpur, Tehsil Hodal, District Palwal.
2. Canara HSBC Oriental Bank of Commerce Life Insurance Company Ltd., Branch Office at 2nd Floor, Orchid Business Park, Sector-48, Sohna Road, Gurugram 122018 through its Branch Manager.
…Respondents.
CORAM: Shri Harnam Singh Thakur, Judicial Member.
Mrs. Manjula, Member.
Present:- Shri Nitin Grover, counsel for the revisionist.
ORDER
Mrs. MANJULA, MEMBER:
1. Present revision petition has been filed by the revisionist against the impugned order dated 14.10.2019 passed by learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Palwal (in short ‘learned District Forum’), vide which the present revisionist, who was opposite party No.2 before learned District Forum, was proceeded against ex-parte.
2. Feeling aggrieved therefrom, revisionist-opposite party No.2 has preferred the present revision petition.
3. The arguments have been advanced by Shri Nitin Grover, learned counsel for the revisionist. With his kind assistance the entire records of the revision petition has been properly perused and examined.
4. Learned counsel for the revisionist vehemently argued that the revisionist-opposite party No.2 received the summons issued by learned District Forum and the same was sent to higher authorities/Legal Department at Karnal to seek instructions and for assigning the matter to the empanelled lawyer. It has further argued that on 14.10.2019, concerned official of revisionist/Bank had appeared before learned District Forum, but by that time learned District Forum had passed the order of ex-parte against the present revisionist. It has further argued that non appearance of the present revisionist before learned District Forum was neither intentional nor willful, so the impugned order dated 14.10.2019 may be set-aside and an opportunity may be given to the present revisionist for filing its written statement, lead its evidence and advancing final arguments on merits.
5. From the perusal of record, it is clear that the present revisionist- opposite party No.2 was proceeded against ex-parte by the learned District Forum, Palwal vide order dated 14.10.2019. However, it is golden principle of law that proper opportunity should be afforded to the concerned parties before deciding the case on merits. So, the present revisionist should be afforded an opportunity of representing itself before learned District Forum. Under these circumstances, impugned order dated 14.10.2019 passed by learned District Forum, Palwal is set-aside for all intents and purposes, present revision petition stands allowed subject to depositing of Rs.5,000/- as of costs to be paid by the present revisionist before learned District Forum, Palwal. The matter is remitted back to the District Forum, Palwal to decide the complaint on merits after affording an opportunity to present revisionist to file its written statement and to lead its respective evidence. The revision petition be consigned to the record room.
6. Parties are directed to appear before the District Forum, Palwal on 23.01.2020 for further proceedings.
December 09th, 2019 Manjula Harnam Singh Thakur Member Judicial Member Addl. Bench Addl. Bench
R.K.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.