Maharashtra

Mumbai(Suburban)

CC/121/2020

MAHESH M. UPADHYAY AND ANR. - Complainant(s)

Versus

HEENA HOLIDAYS PVT LTD AND 4 OTHRS - Opp.Party(s)

JAYESH R. VYAS

09 Dec 2021

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT
ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG, NEAR DR.BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR GARDEN , BANDRA (E), MUMBAI-400051
 
Complaint Case No. CC/121/2020
( Date of Filing : 05 Oct 2020 )
 
1. MAHESH M. UPADHYAY AND ANR.
B/3 WING, FLAT NO.8, SCINDIA SOCIETY, M.V.ROAD, ANDHERI EAST, MUMBAI-400069, MAHARASHTRA, INDIA.
2. KINJAL MAHESH UPADHYAY.
B/3 WING, FLAT NO.8, SCINDIA SOCIETY, M.V.ROAD, ANDHERI EAST, MUMBAI-400069, MAHARASHTRA, INDIA.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. HEENA HOLIDAYS PVT LTD AND 4 OTHRS
303/304/305, ML SPACE, OPP. JAIN TEMPLE STATION ROAD, VILE PARLE WEST, MUMBAI-400056, MAHARASHTRA, INDIA.
2. HEENA TOURS AND TRAVELS.
303/304/305, ML SPACE, OPP. JAIN TEMPLE STATION ROAD, VILE PARLE WEST, MUMBAI-400056, MAHARASHTRA, INDIA.
3. JITENDRA NEMCHAND SHAH (DIRECTOR OF HEENA HOLIDAYS PVT LTD)
303/304/305, ML SPACE, OPP. JAIN TEMPLE STATION ROAD, VILE PARLE WEST, MUMBAI-400056, MAHARASHTRA, INDIA. AND 1701/1702 ROYAL EMPIRE,SHAHTRI NAGAR AZAD NAGAR,LOKHANDWALA CIRCLE,ANDHERI WEST,MUMBAI-53.
4. PRABHULAL RUPLAL JOSHI (DIRECTOR OF HEENA HOLIDAYS PVT LTD)
303/304/305,ML SPACE,OPP. JAIN TEMPLE STATION ROAD,VILE PARLE WEST,MUMBAI-400056, MAHARASHTRA,INDIA. AND ROOM NO.506, BUILDING NO.4,KAMDHENU SHOPPING CENTRE,LOKHANDWALA COMPLEX,ANDHERI WEST,MUMBAI-53
5. MANOJ SHAH (DIRECTOR OF HEENA HOLIDAYS PVT LTD)
303/304/305,ML SPACE,OPP. JAIN TEMPLE STATION ROAD,VILE PARLE WEST,MUMBAI-400056,MAHARASHTRA,INDIA.AND KINGSTON,SHASHTRI NAGAR,4 BUNGLOW,ANDHERI WEST, MUMBAI-400053.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SHRI. R.G.WANKHADE. PRESIDENT
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 09 Dec 2021
Final Order / Judgement

आयोगाच्या दोनही मा. सदस्या रजेवर

तक्रारदार क्र. २ हजर

सामनेवाले क्र. १ ते ५ गैरहजर

दि 12/08/2021 रोजी सदर प्रकरण मागे घेण्याबाबत तक्रारदार क्र. २ चे सहीचा व त्यांचे वकीलांचे सहीचा अर्ज संचिकेत दाखल आहे. तका्ररदार क्र. १ हे क्र. २ चे वडील आहेत. तसेच सदर तक्रार मागे घेण्याकामी तक्रारदार क्र. १ ची सुध्दा संमती असल्याचे तक्रारदार क्र. २ ने नमूद केले. अर्जामध्ये नमूद केलेले कारण लक्षात घेता तक्रारदारांना सदर तक्रार मागे घेण्याची परवानगी देण्यात येते. प्रकरण वादसूचीतून काढण्यात यावे.

गौमपो/-

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SHRI. R.G.WANKHADE.]
PRESIDENT
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.