Delhi

West Delhi

CC/11/406

GEETIKA MIDHA - Complainant(s)

Versus

HDFC - Opp.Party(s)

16 Mar 2017

ORDER

                    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CC- 406/11                  D.O.O.- 16/03/2017

Present :-          None for complainant.

                    Counsel for OP.     

Complaint passed over several times since morning. But none put in appearance on behalf of complainant. It is already 02.15 P.M. No further wait is justified and possible. None is appearing for complainant since 04.09.2014 for more than two and half years. It seems that Complainant is not interested in prosecution of Complaint.

Therefore, this forum has no option except to dismiss the Complaint in default for non-prosecution. Hence the Complaint is dismissed in default for non prosecution.

Copy of order be sent to the parties as per rules. File be consigned.   

 

(PUNEET LAMBA)                                      (URMILA GUPTA)                                     ( R.S.  BAGRI )

     MEMBER                                                     MEMBER                                                    PRESIDENT

    16/03/2017                                                              16/03/2017                                                16/03/2017

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.