Haryana

Karnal

CC/294/2022

Virender - Complainant(s)

Versus

HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Rajeev Sharma

27 Sep 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint No.294 of 2022

                                                          Date of instt.26.05.2022

                                                          Date of Decision: 27.09.2024

 

Virender son of Shri Dharambir, resident of Village Ballah, Sub Tehsil Ballah, Tehsil Assandh, District Karnal.

 

          ...…Complainant.

                                        Versus

1. HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Ltd. 8^th Teller IT Park, Tower-1, 5^th Floor C-25, Sector-62, Noida 201301, through its Manager (Claim Department).
2. Amar Hospital, Opposite New Anaj Mandi, Near Maruti Car Agency, Karnal Road, Assandh 132039, Tehsil Assandh, District Karnal, through its authorized signatory.                                                                                                                                             ....Opposite parties.

 

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

 

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Mrs.Neeru Agarwal……..Member

                Mrs. Sarvjeet Kaur…………Member

                               

Present:   None for the Complainant.

                Shri Sanjeev Vohra, counsel for the OP No.1.

                Shri Rajan Gupta, counsel for the OP No.2.

                                                 

               Today the case is fixed evidence of complainant. None has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. Case called several times since morning but none has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. It is already 04:00 PM. No further wait is justified.

                A careful perusal of the file reveals that in the present complaint, the written version has been filed by the OPs on 25.07.2022 and 25.09.2023 respectively. The complainant has availed several effective opportunities for leading his evidence but the complainant has failed to conclude the same. It appears that the complainant is no more interested to pursue the present complaint. Further adjournment for the same purpose would not be justified as it would amount to wastage of precious time of this Commission.

                Hence, in view the above facts the present complaint is hereby dismissed. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Dated: 27.09.2024.          

                           President, 

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

  (Neeru Agarwal)              (Sarvjeet Kaur) 

       Member                           Member