STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
U.T.,CHANDIGARH
First Appeal No. | : | 345 of 2013 |
Date of Institution | : | 08.08.2013 |
Date of Decision | : | 09.10.2013 |
Raghbir Singh Chaudhary son of Late Sh.Sawarn Ram, R/o V.P.O. Devi Nagar, Sector 3, Panchkula.
VersusHDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Limited, SCO
Appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
BEFORE:
Argued by:Sh. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate for the appellant.
Sh. Sanjeev Goyal, Advocate alongwith Sh. Gaurav
PER DEV RAJ, MEMBER
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9. wherein the claim was closed/filed due to non-submission of the requisite necessary/relevant documents, and the National Commission held no deficiency on the part of the Insurer in closing the claim for want of relevant documents.
10.
11.
12. ,
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Pronounced.
9th.
Sd/-
[JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER (RETD.)]
PRESIDENT
Sd/-
[DEV RAJ]
MEMBER
AD
STATE COMMISSION
(First Appeal No.345 of 2013)
Argued by:Sh. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate for the appellant.
Sh. Sanjeev Goyal, Advocate alongwith Sh. Gaurav
Dated the 9th
ORDER
Vide our detailed order of the even date, recorded
DEV RAJ MEMBER | (JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER (RETD.)) PRESIDENT | |
Ad
|
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER] |
PRESIDENT |
|
[HON'ABLE MR. DEV RAJ] |
MEMBER |