Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

355/2008

Rangabashyam saravanan - Complainant(s)

Versus

HDFC Bank,Manager - Opp.Party(s)

G.Jaishankar

22 Feb 2017

ORDER

                                                                        Date of Filing :   28.08.2008

                                                                        Date of Order :   22.02.2016

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)

     2^nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

 

PRESENT: THIRU.  S. PANDIAN, B.Sc., L.L.M.                      : PRESIDENT   

                 R. T.PAUL RAJASEKARAN, M.A ,D.Min.PGDHRDI, AIII,BCS : MEMBER II

 

C.C.NO.355/2008

WEDNESDAY THIS 22^ND  DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017

 

Rangabashyam Saravanan,

S/o. Mr. Rangabashyam,

No.12/30, Robertson Road,

Mandaveli,

Chennai 600 028.                                                       ..Complainant 

 

                                             ..Vs..

 

1.  The HDFC Bank Limited,

Rep. by its Manager,

Having its office at No.59,

G.N.Chetty Road,

T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017.

 

2. The HDFC Bank Limited,

Rep. by its Manager,

HDFC Bank House,

Senapati Bapat Marg Lower Parel,

Mumbai  400 013.                                                 ..Opposite parties.

 

For the Complainant           :    M/s. G.Jaishankar   

For the opposite parties      :    M/s. T.K.M.Sai Krishanan Associates.

ORDER

THIRU. S. PANDIAN,

 

 Complaint under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986. Complaint is filed seeking direction against the opposite parties to pay a  sum of Rs.10 lakhs for mental agony, hardship and mental agony and also to pay a sum of Rs.10 lakhs towards gross negligence, dereliction of duty and deficiency of service and unfair trade practice.

        Proof affidavit of complainant not filed.  

        Pass over

        At 5.30 p.m.

        Proof affidavit of complainant not filed for a long time, inspite of sufficient time given.   Complainant is called absent, no other representation.   It clearly shows the disinterest of the complainant in the proceedings of the complaint.   Therefore there is no justification to proceed further, proof affidavit of complainant is closed.  Hence the complaint is dismissed for default.  No cost.

 

MEMBER-II                                                                       PRESIDENT.