Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/92/2014

MAHADEVAN G. SUBRAMANIAN - Complainant(s)

Versus

HDFC BANK - Opp.Party(s)

K.M. VIJAYAM ASSO

27 Sep 2022

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
First Appeal No. FA/92/2014
( Date of Filing : 03 Jan 2014 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )
 
1. MAHADEVAN G. SUBRAMANIAN
B-14, THE NEST, RATNA NAGAR, MAIN ROAD, TEYNAMPET, CHENNAI-18
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. HDFC BANK
OLD BUILDING C-WING, 3RD FLOOR, 26-A, NARAYAN PROPERTIES, CHANDIVALLI FARM ROAD, OFF SAKI VIHAR ROAD, CHANDIVALLI, ANDHERI EAST, MUMBAI-400 072
2. HDFC BANK, THE MANAGER
R.A. PURAM BRANCH, CHENNAI-28
CHENNAI
TAMILNADU
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. R.VENKATESAPERUMAL MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 27 Sep 2022
Final Order / Judgement

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                        BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                            Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::      MEMBER

 

 FA. No. 92/2014

(Against the order in C.C. No. 350/2007, dated 11.10.2013, on the file of

District Consumer Forum, Chennai(South)

 

                                                        DATED THIS THE 27TH  DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022

 

Mahadevan G.Subramanian,

Rep.by power of Attorney S.G.Subramanian ,

B-14, The Nest, Ratna Nagar, Main Road,

Teynampet, Chennai – 18                                 ..Appellant/complainant

 

                                                 Vs

1.HDFC Bank,

Old Building C-Wing,

3rd Floor, 26-A, Narayan Properties,

Chandivalli Farm Road,

Off. Saki Vihar Road,

Chandivalli, Andheri East,

Mumbai – 400 072                       

 

2. HDFC Bank,

Rep.by its Manager,

R.A.Puram Branch, Chennai-28                       ..Respondents 1 & 2/ops 1 & 2

 

Counsel for the Appellant/complainant               : M/s K.M.Vijayan Associates

Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 2/ops 1 & 2     : M/s King and Patridge

 

          This appeal is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :-

                                                       Docket order

          No representation for appellant. Respondents 1 and 2 present. This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant and for filing written arguments of appellant and for arguments in list or for dismissal. Today when the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the appellant was not present hence, passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the appellant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

               Sd/-                                                                                                  Sd/-

R VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                      R.SUBBIAH                  

      MEMBER                                                                                               PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. R.VENKATESAPERUMAL]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.