View 5469 Cases Against HDFC Bank
View 5469 Cases Against HDFC Bank
Aashik Siraj filed a consumer case on 27 Sep 2022 against HDFC Bank in the North Chennai Consumer Court. The case no is CC/322/2018 and the judgment uploaded on 22 Nov 2022.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
CHENNAI (NORTH)
@ 2ND Floor, T.N.P.S.C. Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003.
PRESENT : THIRU G. VINOBHA, M.A., B.L., : PRESIDENT
TMT. KAVITHA KANNAN, M.E. : MEMBER-I
THIRU V. RAMAMURTHY, B.A., B.L., PGDLA : MEMBER-II
TUESSDAY THE 27th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022
C.C.NO.322/2018
Aashik Siraj,
Plot #:6 7th street 1st floor,
Govindasamy nagar,
Madipakkam Chennai-91
…..Complainant
..Vs..
1). Branch Manager,
HDFC Bank Madipakkam Branch,
#:5 Sabari Salai Madipakkam
Chennai-91
2).Vice President HDFC bank
Santhome Branch ‘Bay Castle’
#:30 Santhome High Road,
Chennai-28. …..Opposite parties.
Counsel for Complainant : M/s. S.Natarajan
Counsel for opposite parties : M/s.King & Partridge
ORDER
BY PRESIDENT THIRU. G.VINOBHA, M.A.,B.L.,
This complaint is filed by the complainant u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.1986.
The complainant filed this complaint against the opposite parties to forthwith produce documents namely and signature request made and joint account opening form and change of signature by Sanath and suresh which had 3 different signatures and original request made at Santhome on 05.07.2011 and signature details/mandate etc. from April 2011 onwards given by complainant and to pay Rs.5,00,000/- for the deficiency of service and negligence of the opposite parties in not furnishing the document sought for, effectively answer and conduct a thorough investigation as return of 2 cheques for reason “payment stopped”, mere giving of interest as a sop, expressing an apology unmindful of the grave nature of their nonchalant acts deeply injuring complainant and to pay Rs.5,00,000/- for the resultant mental agony and pain caused by such deficiency of service and to pay Rs.25,000/- as cost.
Complainant and Complainant counsel absent. No representation. Sufficient opportunity given. Hence, Complaint is dismissed for default.
Order Pronounced dated 27th September 2022.
MEMBER – I MEMBER – II PRESIDENT
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.