Tamil Nadu

North Chennai

CC/322/2018

Aashik Siraj - Complainant(s)

Versus

HDFC Bank - Opp.Party(s)

S.Natarajan

27 Sep 2022

ORDER

                                                                      

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI (NORTH)

@ 2^ND Floor, T.N.P.S.C. Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003.

 

PRESENT : THIRU G. VINOBHA, M.A., B.L.,                         : PRESIDENT

                                  TMT. KAVITHA KANNAN, M.E.                          : MEMBER-I

                                  THIRU V. RAMAMURTHY, B.A., B.L., PGDLA : MEMBER-II

                      

TUESSDAY THE 27^th    DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022

C.C.NO.322/2018

 

Aashik Siraj,

Plot #:6 7^th street 1^st floor,

Govindasamy nagar,

Madipakkam Chennai-91

 

                                                                                          …..Complainant

 ..Vs..

1). Branch Manager,

HDFC Bank Madipakkam Branch,

#:5 Sabari Salai Madipakkam

Chennai-91

2).Vice President HDFC bank

Santhome Branch ‘Bay Castle’

#:30 Santhome High Road,

Chennai-28.                                                                             …..Opposite parties.

 

Counsel for Complainant                          : M/s. S.Natarajan

 

Counsel for  opposite parties                    : M/s.King & Partridge

 

 

ORDER

BY PRESIDENT THIRU. G.VINOBHA, M.A.,B.L.,

          This complaint is filed by the complainant u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.1986.

          The complainant filed this complaint against the opposite parties to forthwith produce documents namely and signature request made and joint account opening form and change of signature by Sanath and suresh which had 3 different signatures and original request made at Santhome on 05.07.2011 and signature details/mandate etc. from April 2011 onwards given by complainant and to pay Rs.5,00,000/- for the deficiency of service and negligence of the opposite parties in not furnishing the document sought for, effectively answer and conduct a thorough investigation as return of 2 cheques for reason “payment stopped”, mere giving of interest as a sop, expressing an apology unmindful of the grave nature of their nonchalant acts deeply injuring complainant and to pay Rs.5,00,000/- for the resultant mental agony and pain caused by such deficiency of service and to pay Rs.25,000/- as cost.

Complainant and Complainant counsel absent.  No representation.  Sufficient opportunity given.  Hence, Complaint  is dismissed for default.

Order Pronounced dated 27^th   September  2022.

 

MEMBER – I                 MEMBER – II                                PRESIDENT