NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/2703/2009

DEBJYOTI DUTTA & ANR. - Complainant(s)

Versus

HDFC BANK LTD., CUTTACK & ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. SHIBHASHISH MISRA

10 Sep 2009

ORDER

Date of Filing: 27 Jul 2009

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/2703/2009
(Against the Order dated 27/08/2008 in Appeal No. 680/2008 of the State Commission Orissa)
1. DEBJYOTI DUTTA & ANR.S/o. Shri Ashok Kumar Dutta. R/o. Deulasahi Po. Tulasipur. Ps. Bidanasi Cuttack ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. HDFC BANK LTD., CUTTACK & ORS. Bajrakabati Road. Cuttack At. P/O. Distt. Cuttack, Orissa 2. GENERAL MANAGER. GRIEVANCE AND REDRESSAL CELL . HDFC BANK LTD. Old Building C Wing 3rd Floor. 26. a Narayan Properties Chandivali Farm Road, Off. Saki Vihar Road. Mumbai -2000723. MR. MADHU SUDAN HEDGE. CODE COMPLIANCE OFFICER HDFC BANK LTD. 3rd Floor. Uniworth House . DA Guru Sadaya Road. Kolkata -700019 ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. B.K. TAIMNI ,MEMBER
For the Appellant :MR. SHIBHASHISH MISRA
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 10 Sep 2009
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

           This revision petition has been filed with a delay of 234 days which is over and above the statutory period of 90 days given for filing the revision petition.  Under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 consumer foras are required to decide the cases within 90 days and in case some evidence is required to be taken, within 150- days.  The delay of 234 days, under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 under


-2-

the circumstances, cannot be condoned without showing sufficient cause for delay in filing the revision petition.  We are not satisfied with the cause shown for condonation of delay.  Application for condonation of delay is dismissed.  accordingly, revision petition is dismissed as barred by time.



......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................B.K. TAIMNIMEMBER