Haryana

Karnal

CC/708/2021

Manju - Complainant(s)

Versus

HDB Financial Services Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Des Raj Goyal

24 Aug 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint.No.708 of 2021

                                                          Date of instt.21.12.2021

                                                          Date of Decision:24.08.2023

 

Maju wife of Sh. Inder Singh, resident of house no.15/595, Jundla gate, Karnal.

          ...…Complainant

                                        Versus

1. HDB Financial Services Ltd., SCO-84, 2^nd floor, Mahila Ashram complex, near bus stand, Karnal, through its Branch Manager.
2. Tata AIG General Insurance Co.Ltd., Plot no.E-1, 1^st and 2^nd floor, Sector-3, Nodia (UP), through its Branch Manager.

 

2. TATA AIG General Insurance Co.Ltd., 301-308, Aggarwal Prestige Mall Tower, 3^rd floor, plot no.2, road no.44, main road, near M2K Cinema, Rani Bagh, Pitampura, Delhi.

 

 

                        ....Opposite parties.

                                             

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                Dr. Rekha Chaudhary……..Member.

               

Present:  None for the complainant.

                Shri Dheeraj Sachdeva, counsel for the OP-1.

                 

                Today the case is fixed for notice to the OP-2. Notice not received back either served or unserved. No one has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. The present complaint pertains to years 2021 and same is still at the stage of preliminary hearing, repeatedly the case has been adjourned on the request of learned counsel for the complainant. Case called several times since morning but none has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. It is already 04:00 PM. It appears that complainant is no more interested to pursue his case. There is no justification to adjourn the case further for the same purpose.

                Hence, in view the above facts, the present complaint is hereby dismissed. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced
Dated:24.08.2023             

                        President,     

District Consumer Disputes                                                  

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary) 

  Member                Member