View 2959 Cases Against Haryana
NEELAM SHARMA filed a consumer case on 26 Sep 2017 against HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHROITY in the Panchkula Consumer Court. The case no is CC/214/2017 and the judgment uploaded on 27 Sep 2017.
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA.
Complaint Case No. | : | 214 of 2017 |
Date of Institution | : | 25.09.2017 |
Date of Decision | : | 26.09.2017 |
Ms.Neelam Sharma w/o Mr.Roshan Garg, R/o House No.8, Sector-11, Panchkula-134109.
….Complainant
Versus
1. Haryana Urban Development Authority, (HUDA), through Chief Administrator, Sector-6, Panchkula.
2. Estate Officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority, (HUDA), Sector-6, Panchkula.
….Opposite Parties
COMPLAINT UNDER SEC. 12 OF THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986.
Before: Mr.Dharam Pal, President. Mrs.Anita Kapoor, Member.
Mr.Jagmohan Singh, Member.
Present: Mr.Viraj Gandhi, Adv., or the complainant.
Today the case was fixed for consideration on the admissibility of he complaint. At this stage, counsel for the complainant has made a separate statement in which he states that he wants to withdraw his present complaint with liberty to file afresh before the appropriate authority.
Heard. In view of the statement, the present complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh before the appropriate authority. We order accordingly. Original complaint be returned to the complaint.
A copy of this order be sent to the complainant free of costs and file be consigned to record room after due compliance.
Dt.26.09.2017 (Jagmohan Singh) (Anita Kapoor) (Dharam Pal)
Member Member President
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.