Complainant/petitioner’s father was allotted an industrial plot No.1586/1, MIE, Bahadurgarh on 18.5.1984 and thereafter transferred in his name vide Memo No.2050 dated 29.9.2007.  Petitioner filed the complaint alleging that in spite of his completing all the necessary formalities and requests made, respondents have not sanctioned the building plan. 

             District Forum allowed the complaint, aggrieved against which, respondents filed appeal before the State Commission.  State Commission, relying upon three judgements of this Commission in “Monstera Estate Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ardee Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., IV (2010) CPJ 299 (NC);  SKG Engineering Pvt. Ltd. vs. Emaar MGF Land Pvt. Ltd., III (2010) CPJ 260 (NC); and Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Ltd. (RIICO) vs. M/s Diksha Enterprises – III (2010) CPJ 333 (NC)” held that since the appellant had purchased the property for commercial purpose, the complaint filed by him was not maintainable.

             We agree with the view taken by the State Commission.  The decisions referred to by the State Commission are squarely applicable to the facts of the case.  We are bound by the decision of the Coordinate Benches.

Dismissed reserving liberty with the petitioner to seek relief of his grievances from any other Forum along with an application under Section 14 of the Indian Limitation Act for condoning the delay for the time spent before the consumer fora, keeping in mind the observations made by the Supreme Court in Laxmi Engineering Works vs. PSG Industrial Institute – (1995) 3 SCC 583.