NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/2011/2012

RESHMA DEVI - Complainant(s)

Versus

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. VIRENDRA SINGH

24 Aug 2012

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 2011 OF 2012
 
(Against the Order dated 13/01/2012 in Appeal No. 558/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. RESHMA DEVI
W/o Sh Om Prakash R/o House No-856 Sector-3
Faridabad
Haryana
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS.
Through its Cheif Adminstraotr,Sector-6, Through its Estate Officer
Panchkula
Haryana
2. The Adminstrator HUDA
Sec-12,Faridabad, Through its Estate Officer, HUDA
Faridabad
Haryana
3. The Estate Officer,
HUDA, Sector-12
Faridabad
Haryana
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. VINAY KUMAR, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :MR. VIRENDRA SINGH
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 24 Aug 2012
ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner heard at length.  He admits that the complainant is not a consumer and he should be granted opportunity to place his grievance before the appropriate forum/court. 

          We accept his contention and the case is dismissed as withdrawn but the complainant is given liberty to approach any other forum/court for redressal of his grievance.

 
......................J
J.M. MALIK
PRESIDING MEMBER
......................
VINAY KUMAR
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.