Haryana

Rohtak

EA/19/148

Bhupender Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Haryana Urban Development Authority. - Opp.Party(s)

Dh in Person

11 Jan 2021

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.
Haryana.
 
Execution Application No. EA/19/148
( Date of Filing : 30 Jul 2019 )
In
Complaint Case No. CC/18/218
 
1. Bhupender Singh
S/o Sh. Phool kanwar R/o VPO Karawar, tehsil and district Rohtak.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Haryana Urban Development Authority.
(Now Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran), Sector-3, Rohtak through its estate officer.
2. Chief Adminstrator,
Haryana Urban Development Authority ( Now Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran), Sector-6, Panchkula through its estate officer.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Nagender Singh Kadian PRESIDENT
  Dr. Renu Chaudhary MEMBER
  Mrs. Tripti Pannu MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 11 Jan 2021
Final Order / Judgement

            Bhupender Vs. HUDA

 

Present:          Sh.Bhupinder Singh, DH in person.

                        Sh.M.K.Munjal Advocate for the JD

           

                        File taken up today on the application of DH Bhupinder Singh for releasing the amount and to furnish the surety bonds.  Report of Assistant perused as per which a cheque no.500746 dated 04.01.2021 for Rs.429750/- has been produced by the bank before this Commission on dated 06.01.2021 and the same is placed on file.

                        Mrs. Kavita (surety of DH) made a statement that in the present case if opposite party makes an appeal before the higher Court and if the order is passed against the DH, then she will be liable to refund the received amount. Requisite Surety bonds have been furnished, which are accepted and attested today.

                         DH Bhupinder Singh made a statement that he has received a DD No.500746 dated 04.01.2021 amounting to Rs.429750/-(Rupees four lac twenty nine thousand seven hundred and fifty only) and in case order has been passed against the DH by the higher Court, then he will be liable to refund the whole amount. So he does not want to proceed with the present execution subject to clearance of DD.

                        In view of the statement made by DH, present execution stands dismissed as withdrawn, subject to clearance of DD.

 

 

Member                                             Member                     President/11.01.2021.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Nagender Singh Kadian]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Dr. Renu Chaudhary]
MEMBER
 
 
[ Mrs. Tripti Pannu]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.