Haryana

Panipat

CC/16/104

Som Nath - Complainant(s)

Versus

Haryana Urban Development Authority Panipat - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Ramesh Kaushik

03 Oct 2017

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
PANIPAT
 
Complaint Case No. CC/16/104
 
1. Som Nath
Son of Sh. Jogi Ram Age about 55 years R/O Devi Lal Colony Sector-12, HUDA, Panipat
Panipat
Haryana
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Haryana Urban Development Authority Panipat
Sector 13-17, Panipat
Panipat
Haryana
2. Chief Administrator
HUDA Sector-6 Panchkula.
Panchkula
Haryana
3. Administrator
HUDA Rohtak
ROHTAK
Haryana
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SUMEER SINGH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Samarjeet Singh Samran MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
Sh. Ramesh Kaushik Advocate for the complainant.
 
For the Opp. Party:
Sh. Ashok kadyan Advocate for the OPs.
 
Dated : 03 Oct 2017
Final Order / Judgement

                The Learned counsel for the complainant has made a statement for withdrawal of the present complaint by submitting that OPs have allotted plot to the complainant, therefore, he does not want to pursue with the present complaint. His statement has been recorded in this regard separately.

2.            In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the complainant, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Dated 3/10/2017.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SUMEER SINGH]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Samarjeet Singh Samran]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.