NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/1035/2023

RAJ KUMAR WADHWA - Complainant(s)

Versus

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NOW HARYANA SHEHARI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN & 2 ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. NAVEEN SHARMA & SWATI BHUSHAN SHARMA

27 Apr 2023

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 1034 OF 2023
 
(Against the Order dated 24/02/2023 in Appeal No. 42/2022 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. RADHA THAKUR
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NOW HARYANA SHEHARI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN & 2 ORS.
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 1035 OF 2023
 
(Against the Order dated 24/02/2023 in Appeal No. 43/2022 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. RAJ KUMAR WADHWA
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NOW HARYANA SHEHARI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN & 2 ORS.
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 1036 OF 2023
 
(Against the Order dated 07/04/2023 in Appeal No. 336/2023 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. SUDARSHANA BATRA
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NOW HARYANA SHEHARI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN & 2 ORS.
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL,PRESIDENT

For the Petitioner :
: Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate
For the Respondent :

Dated : 27 April 2023
ORDER

Mrs. Radha Thakur has approached this Commission by filing the Revision Petition under Section 58(1)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 against the Order dated 24.02.2023 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana Panchkula (hereinafter referred to as “the State Commission”) in First Appeal No.42/2022, whereby the First Appeal preferred by the Petitioner herein has been dismissed and affirmed the Order passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Gurgaon (hereinafter referred to as “the District Commission”).

The District Commission had awarded interest as per the rates of HUDA policy on each deposit till offer of alternate plot which is @ 9 per cent per annum. The Petitioner is limiting only on the question of awarding interest. According to the Petitioner, the interest should be 24 per cent per annum. It may be mentioned here that presently the Hon’ble Supreme Court has been awarding maximum rate of interest of @ 9 per cent per annum on the amount deposited. Thus, the Order passed by the State Commission is inconformity with the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. I find no ground to interfere in the Impugned Order passed by the State Commission.

Accordingly, the Revision Petition is dismissed.  

 
......................J
R.K. AGRAWAL
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.