View 8457 Cases Against Agriculture
View 2935 Cases Against Haryana
KUSUM BANSAL filed a consumer case on 06 Sep 2016 against HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD in the StateCommission Consumer Court. The case no is CC/217/2016 and the judgment uploaded on 04 Nov 2016.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA.
Complaint No. 217 of 2016
Date of the Institution: 09.08.2016
Date of Decision:- 06.09.2016
Mrs. Kusum Bansal wife of Sh. Vinod Kumar, #286, Sector 12A, Panchkula.
….. Complainant
Versus
1. Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board, Mandi Bhawan, C-6, Sector 6, Panchkula through its Chief Administrator.
2. Market Committee, Sector 20, through its Secretary.
….. Opposite Parties
CORAM: Mr. B.M. Bedi, Judicial Member.
Mrs. Urvashi Agnihotri, Member.
Present:- Mr. Vinod Bansal, Husband of complainant.
O R D E R
B.M. BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
1. Mr. Vinod Bansal has stated that this complaint be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file the same before the appropriate authority.
2. It is ordered accordingly.
September 06th, 2016 | Urvashi Agnihotri Member | B.M.Bedi Judicial Member |
(U.K.)
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.