Haryana

StateCommission

CC/568/2018

DEEPINDER SINGH - Complainant(s)

Versus

HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD - Opp.Party(s)

S.S.SIDHU

19 Nov 2019

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA

                                               

 

                                                Consumer Complaint No.568 of 2018

                                                Date of the Institution: 11.10.2018

                                                Date of Decision: 19.11.2019

 

 

Deepinder Singh Sekhon son of late Sh. Kulwant Singh, resident of House No.3212,  Sector 32-D, Chandigarh.

 

…..Complainant

 

 

VERSUS

 

1.      Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board, Mandi Bhavan, Sector 6, Panchkula through its Chief Administrator.

 

2.      Market Committee Panchkula through Secretary Cum Executive Officer, Anaj Mandi, Sector 20, Panchkula.

 

 

 

….. Opposite Parties

 

 

CORAM:    Hon’ble Mr. Justice T.P.S. Mann, President.

                  

 

                    

 

                                     

Present:-    Shri S.S. Sidhu, counsel for the complainant.

                   Shri Rohtash Kumar, Authorized Representative for the opposite parties.

                                      

 

                                                O R D E R

 

 

T.P.S. MANN, J. (ORAL)

 

          This complaint has been filed by Deepinder Singh Sekhon against Hayana State Agricultural Marketing Board, Panchkula and Market Committee, Panchkula.  After issuance of the notice, the opposite parties have put in appearance and filed their written version.  Now the complaint is at the stage of recording evidence of the complainant.

2.      Learned counsel for the complainant states that the complainant has taken the possession of the office site on as is where is basis and therefore he does not want to pursue the complaint any further and wants to withdraw the same.

3.      In support of his stand, he has filed the affidavit of Deepinder Singh Sekhon, the complainant.

4.      In view of the aforementioned developments, learned counsel for the complainant is hereby permitted to withdraw the complaint.

5.      The complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.

 

 

Announced

19.11.2019

 

(T.P.S. Mann)

President

  UK

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.