Haryana

StateCommission

CC/684/2018

ANITA DESWAL - Complainant(s)

Versus

HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN - Opp.Party(s)

GOBIND DHANDA

30 Oct 2019

ORDER

 

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

HARYANA PANCHKULA

                  

                                                Complaint Case No.684 of  2018

Date of the Institution:27.12.2018

Date of Decision:30.10.2019

 

Anita Deswal wife of Shri Anil Deswal, R/o House No. 1974, Sector 12, HUDA, Panipat, District Panipat

                                                                   .….Complainant

Versus

1.      Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran (erstwhile HUDA) through its Chief Administrator, C-3, HSVP Complex, Sector 6, Panchkula.

2.      The Estate Officer, Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran, (erstwhile HUDA), Panipat.

 

                                                .….Opposite parties

CORAM:    Mr. Harnam Singh Thakur, Judicial Member.

                   Ms. Manjula, Member.

                                               

Present:-    Sh. Ajit Sihag, counsel for the complainant.

                   Ms. Manju Saini, counsel for the opposite parties.

 

O R D E R

HARNAM SINGH THAKUR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-

 

                   Learned counsel for the complainant has made a statement that he may be permitted to withdraw the present complaint as the complainant has already taken the possession of the plot in question from the opposite parties.

2.                Present complaint stands dismissed as withdrawn, in pursuance of the respective statement made by learned counsel for the complainant. File be consigned to the records.

 

 

October 30th, 2019

Manjula Member

Harnam Singh Thakur Judicial Member Addl.Bench

M.K