Haryana

Panipat

CC/106/2022

Daya Chand - Complainant(s)

Versus

Haryana Shahri Vikas Pradhikaran - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Balraj Mehra

23 Aug 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
PANIPAT
 
Complaint Case No. CC/106/2022
( Date of Filing : 01 Apr 2022 )
 
1. Daya Chand
Son of Sh. Ganga Dass, Aged 60 years, resident of H.No. 1140, Sector-07, Sonepat. Aadhar Card no.4472 5156 0103.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Haryana Shahri Vikas Pradhikaran
Sector-6, Panchkula, through its Chief Administrator.
2. Estate Officer
Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran, sector-18, Near Toll Plaza, Panipat.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Dr. J.R. Chauhan PRESIDENT
  Dr. Suman Singh MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
Shri Balraj Mehra, Advocate for complainant.
......for the Complainant
 
Shri Sushil Gaur, Advocate for respondents/opposite parties.
......for the Opp. Party
Dated : 23 Aug 2023
Final Order / Judgement

No evidence of complainant is present. A date is requested on behalf of the complainant, which is opposed. Heard. This case is continuing for evidence of the complainant from 18.10.2022 and today is last opportunity. Moreso, the complainant has already availed five effective opportunities including last opportunity. Hence, there are no sufficient grounds for adjourning this case for the purpose of the evidence of the complainant. Hence, the evidence of the complainant is hereby closed by the order of this Commission.

2.         This complaint has been filed again the respondents seeking compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- on account of deficiency in service by respondents. No reply was filed by Ops, hence the defence of Ops was struck off vide order dated 04.08.2022.

3.         As the complainant has come before this Commission for seeking relief, the onus was on the complainant to prove his case by adducing cogent and convincing evidence. Since the complainant has not produced any evidence on record despite several effective opportunities as stated above and hence, there is no iota of evidence on record to substantiate the allegations of the complaint. Hence, the present complaint is hereby dismissed in lacking of evidence. However, both the parties are left to bear their own costs.

4.         This order be communicated to the parties free of costs and the file be consigned to the record-room after due compliance.

 
 
[ Dr. J.R. Chauhan]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Dr. Suman Singh]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.