NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/1072/2007

PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY - Complainant(s)

Versus

HARMEL SINGH - Opp.Party(s)

MS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR

21 Apr 2011

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 1072 OF 2007
 
(Against the Order dated 01/02/2007 in Appeal No. 1218/2001 of the State Commission Punjab)
1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
DEVELOPMENT AUTORITY PUDA COMPLEX CHANDIGARH ROAD BACKSIDE VARDMAN MILLS LUDHIANA THROUGH IRS EATATE
ADMINISTRATOR
-
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. HARMEL SINGH
S/O. SHRI PRITAM SINGH C/O. SHRI, KISHAN CHAND SONI
SEWAK HOSIERY HOSIERY MILLS SATADANGH ROAD
CIVIL LINE LUDHIANA
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 1073 OF 2007
 
(Against the Order dated 17/01/2007 in Appeal No. 1568/2007 of the State Commission Punjab)
1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
THROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER PUDA BHAWAN SECTOR 62.
MOHALI DISTRICT , ROPAR
PUNJAB
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. MOHINDER SINGH AND ORS.
S/O, SHRI BALWANT SINGH HARJIT KAUR W/O. SHRI, MOHINDER SINGH GHAI BOTH R/O. B-XXIII 4017 GURU NANAK
CHOWK SHIVAJI NAGAR
LUDHIANA
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 1074 OF 2007
 
(Against the Order dated 01/02/2007 in Appeal No. 1016/2001 of the State Commission Punjab)
1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
THROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER PUDA BHAWAN SECTOR 62.
MOHALI DISTRICT , ROPAR
PUNJAB
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. HARMINDER SINGH
S/O. SHRI , S, GURUCHARN SINGH R/O. 403. L. MODEL TOWN
LUDHIANA
-
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 2743 OF 2007
 
(Against the Order dated 17/01/2007 in Appeal No. 1568/2006 of the State Commission Punjab)
1. MOHINDER SINGH GHAI
B - XXIII - 4017,GURU NANAK CHOWK, SHIVAJI NAGAR,
LUDHIANA
( PUNJAB )
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. P.U.D.A
THROUGHT ITS ESTATE OFFICER, FEROZPUR ROAD,
LUDHIANA
( PUNJAB )
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. VINEETA RAI, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :MS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR
For the Respondent :
For the Respondents : Mr.Asutosh Walia and Mr.Nikhil
(in RPs 1072 & 1074/07) Bahri, Advocates
For Mohinder Singh : In person

Dated : 21 Apr 2011
ORDER

The point in issue is squarely concluded against PUDA and in favour of the complainants by an order of this Commission in Narinder Singh Nanda vs. PUDA – Revision Petitions No.2125 and cross-revision R.P. No. 2568/2006 decided on 27.5.2009.

          Revision Petitions No.1072-1074/2007 filed by PUDA are disposed of in terms of our order in Narinder Singh Nanda’s case (supra).

          R.P. No.2743/2007 has been filed by Mr.Mohinder Singh Ghai against PUDA against the order passed by the State Commission condoning the delay of 72 days in filing the appeal.  This Revision Petition is cross-revision to R.P. No.1073/2007.  Since we have disposed of the R.P. No.1073/2007 filed by PUDA against Mohinder Singh Ghai in terms of an order of this Commission in Narinder Singh Nanda’s case (supra), this Revision Petition has become infructuous and is dismissed as such.  Otherwise also, we feel that the State Commission has rightly condoned the delay of 72 days in filing the appeal.  Dismissed.

 

 
......................J
ASHOK BHAN
PRESIDENT
......................
VINEETA RAI
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.