Punjab

Jalandhar

CC/441/2018

Ranjit Kaur Age 46 Years - Complainant(s)

Versus

Harinder Investment Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Sumit Verma

20 Apr 2021

ORDER

Distt Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,
2nd Floor, Room No - 217
JALANDHAR
(PUNJAB)
 
Complaint Case No. CC/441/2018
( Date of Filing : 22 Oct 2018 )
 
1. Ranjit Kaur Age 46 Years
w/o Ajinder Singh, R/o Hno. 1019, Sant Nagar, Ladowali Road, Jalandhar-144001. Mobile 8264563276
Jalandhar
Punjab
2. Harleen Kaur Age 21 Years
d/o Ranjit Kaur W/o Ajinder Singh R/o Hno. 1019, Sant Nagar, Ladowali Road, Jalandhar-144001. Mobile 8264563276
Jalandhar
Punjab
3. Manpreet Singh (Minor) Age 13 Years
Through Mother Ranjit Kaur W/o Ajinder Singh, R/o Hno. 1019, Sant Nagar, Ladowali Road, Jalandhar-144001
Jalandhar
Punjab
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Harinder Investment Limited
1st Floor, Near Hotel Kings, GT Road, 1st floor, Near Hotel Kings, GT Road, Jalandhar. Through its Manging Director/Director/Authorised Representative.
Jalandhar
Punjab
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Kuljit Singh PRESIDENT
  Jyotsna MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
Sh. Sumit Verma, Adv. Counsel for the Complainants.
......for the Complainant
 
OP exparte.
......for the Opp. Party
Dated : 20 Apr 2021
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES

REDRESSAL COMMISSION, JALANDHAR.

                                                                   Complaint No.441 of 2018

                                                                   Date of Instt. 22.10.2018

                                                                   Date of Decision: 20.04.2021

1. Ranjit Kaur Age 46 years W/o Ajinder Singh, R/o H. No.1019, Sant Nagar, Ladowali Road, Jalandhar-144001 Mobile Phone No.8264563276, 9815304632

2. Haleen Kaur Age 21 years D/o Ranjit Kaur, Wife of Ajinder Singh, R/o H. No.1019, Sant Nagar, Ladowali Road, Jalandhar-144001) Mobile Phone No.8264563276, 9815304632

3. Manpreet Singh (Minor) Age 13 years, Through Mother Ranjit Kaur W/o Ajinder Singh H. No.1019, Sant Nagar, Ladowali Road, Jalandhar-144001

..........Complainants

Versus

 

Harinder Investments Limited, 1st Floor, Near Hotel Kings, G. T. Road, Jalandhar. Through its Managing Director/Director/Authorized Representative.

                                                                            ….….. Opposite Party

Complaint Under the Consumer Protection Act.

 

Before:        Sh. Kuljit Singh              (President)

                   Smt. Jyotsna                      (Member)

Present:       Sh. Sumit Verma, Adv. Counsel for the Complainants.

                   OP exparte.

Order

                   Kuljit Singh (President)

1. The instant complaint has been filed by the complainants, wherein alleged that the complainant No.1 was allured tempted, induced and persuaded by OP for investment by deposit of money on interest to earn her livelihood to augment the meager income to make both ends meet. The complainant No.1 believing the sweet words and assurance given by OP, invested with OP a sum of Rs.25,078/- on 29.12.2016 @ 11% PA for 12 months which matured on 29.12.2017 with maturity value of Rs.27,980/- vide FDR No.16394. That the complainant No.1 visited the OP several times to get the matured amount of above said FDR, but every time the OP put the complainant on one pretext or other and ignored to give the payment of above said matured FDR. That on 12.09.2018 the complainant sent a registered legal notice to OP through her advocate requesting to give the payment of above said matured FDR, but all in vain and as such, necessity arose to file the present complaint with the prayer that the complaint of the complainants may be accepted and OP be directed to pay the amount of FDR Ex.C-1 Rs.27,980/- and further OP be directed to give interest @ 11% per annum till realization and further OP be directed to pay litigation expenses of Rs.5500/- and compensation for mental tension and harassment to the tune of Rs.60,000/-.

2. Notice of the complaint was given to the OP, but despite service OP failed to appear and ultimately, OP was proceeded against exparte.

3. In order to prove her case, the counsel for the complainant tendered into evidence two affidavits Ex.CA and Ex.CB alongwith some documents Ex.C-1 and Ex.C-2 and closed the exparte evidence.

4. We have heard the learned counsel for the complainant and have also gone through the case file very minutely.

5. From the perusal of the pleadings of the complainants, it is clear that complainant No.1 had deposited a sum of Rs.25,078/-, vide FDR No.16394 on 29.12.2016 with maturity value of Rs.27,980 on 29.12.2017, which is evident from Ex.C-1. Now question remains whether the complainants virtually ever approached to the OP for making the payment of said matured FDR, regarding that a legal notice served by the complainant on 12.09.2018 and in response to the legal notice, the OP did not bother to pay the matured amount. If the OP ready to make the payment, then why the OP did not give offer to complainants to get the payment of the matured FDR.

6. Apart from that the photostat copy of the FDR available on the file Ex.C-1 having No.16394 dated 29.12.2016 and the maturity value is Rs.27,980/- and maturity date 29.12.2017. There is not iota of documents available on the file, served by the OP to the complainants that their FDR is matured and get the payment, so, it means the OP also did not call upon the complainants to get the payment of matured FDR. So, under these circumstances and unrebutted evidence, we find that the OP himself is negligent for not paying the maturity amount despite repeated request of the complainants, which is tantamount to deficiency in service and accordingly, we reached to the conclusion that the complainants are entitled for the relief claimed.

7. In the light of above detailed discussion, the complaint of the complainants is partly accepted and OP is directed to reimburse the maturity amount of both the FDR i.e. in total Rs.27,980/- with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of maturity, till realization and further OP is directed to pay compensation and litigation expenses to the complainant for causing mental tension and harassment to the complainant, to the tune of Rs.5000/-. The entire compliance be made within one month from the date of receipt of the copy of order. This complaint could not be decided within stipulated time frame due to rush of work and spread of Covid-19.

8.               Copies of the order be supplied to the parties free of cost, as per Rules. File be indexed and consigned to the record room after due compliance.

 

 

Announced in open Commission

 

20th of April 2021

 

 

 

 

Kuljit Singh

(President)

 

 

 

Jyotsna

(Member)

 

 
 
[ Kuljit Singh]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Jyotsna]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.