Haryana

StateCommission

A/962/2015

M/S LR AUTOMOBILES KAITHAL - Complainant(s)

Versus

HARDEEP SINGH - Opp.Party(s)

SUNIL POLIST

01 Dec 2015

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA

                                               

                                      First Appeal No.962 of 2015

                                Date of Institution:03.11.2015

                                Date of Decision:01.12.2015

 

 

M/s LR Automobiles Kaithal, N.H 65,  Ambala Road, Kaitha, Tehsil & District Kaithal, through its Manager.

                                                                     …Appellant

                       

                                Versus

 

1.     Hardeep Singh S/o Sh. Ram Pal R/o # 621/16,  Nehru Garden Colony, Kaithal, Tehsil & District Kaithal.

…Respondent

2.     Hyundai Motors India Pvt. Ltd. Plot No.H-1 Sipcot Industrial Park, irrungattukottukottai, Sriprumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram, District-Tamilnadu-602117 through its Managing Director.

                                                   …Performa Respondent

 

CORAM:     Mr. R.K. Bishnoi, Judicial Member

                Mrs. Urvashi Agnihotri, Member

 

 

Present:     Mr. Sunil Polist, Advocate for the appellant.

 

                                O R D E R

 

R.K. BISHNOI, JUDICIAL MEMBER

 

1.     It was alleged by the complainant that the car sold to him was having three cylinders, but, four cylinders  were mentioned in the invoice. It was told that the car was having four cylinders.

2.     Opposite parties (in short ‘Ops’) controverted his averments and stated that due to inadvertence four cylinders were mentioned in the bills. They were ready to get the number of cylinders corrected in registration certificate. So, the impugned order be set aside.

3.     Arguments heard. File perused.

4.     It is admitted by the appellant that number of cylinders were wrongly mentioned in the bills. Due to their clerical mistake complainant suffered mental harassment. For this purpose learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kaithal has awarded only Rs.15,000/- as compensation which cannot be considered on higher side. Impugned order is well reasoned based on law and facts. There is no reason to interfere with the same. Hence, the appeal is hereby dismissed in limine. 

5.     Statutory amount of Rs.7500/- deposited at the time of filing the appeal be refunded to the appellant against proper receipt and identification in accordance with rules, after the expiry of period of appeal and revision, if any filed in this case.

 

December 01^st,            Urvashi Agnihotri      R.K. Bishnoi

2015                            Member                          Judicial Member

                                           Addl. Bench                   Addl. Bench