Karnataka

StateCommission

A/315/2013

The Manager, Shriram City Union Finance Ltd., - Complainant(s)

Versus

Hanumanthappa - Opp.Party(s)

P.N. Rajeswara

04 Aug 2021

ORDER

KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.
 
First Appeal No. A/315/2013
( Date of Filing : 15 Mar 2013 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 04/03/2013 in Case No. EP/8/2012 of District Koppal)
 
1. The Manager, Shriram City Union Finance Ltd.,
Near Head Post Office, Koppal
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Hanumanthappa
S/o. Yankappa Vaddar, Aged 38 years, Occ: Private Work, R/o. Kolihal, Tq. Yelaburga, Dist. Koppal .
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Ravishankar PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt.Sunita Channabasappa Bagewadi MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 04 Aug 2021
Final Order / Judgement

 


Appellant/s

1 . The Manager, Shriram City Union Finance Ltd., .
Near Head Post Office, Koppal
(By P.N. Rajeswara)

-Versus-

Respondent/s

1 . Hanumanthappa .
S/o. Yankappa Vaddar, Aged 38 years, Occ: Private Work, R/o. Kolihal, Tq. Yelaburga, Dist. Koppal .
(By N.P.Singri)

04.08.2021

ORDER

Mr. RAVISHANKAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER

1.        The appellant/Opposite Party filed this appeal way back in the year 2013 being aggrieved by the Order dt.04.03.2013 passed in Criminal Complaint (EP) No.08/2012 on the file of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Koppal wherein the District Commission allowed the complaint which directed the Accused/Opposite Party to undergo one month simple imprisonment and also to pay Rs.2,000/- to the complainant.  In defult of making payment of the fine amount, the accused shall suffer further imprisonment for a period of one week.

2.        The appellant not appeared before this Commission inspite of giving sufficient opportunities to address his arguments and to convince how the impugned order passed by the District Commission is not satisfactory and against to law. 

3.        The case called twice, appellant not present.

4.        We have perused the appeal memo.  Mere memorandum of appeal is not sufficient to hold the appeal in the absence of any arguments and convincement by the appellant.  As such, the appeal requires to be dismissed.  Accordingly, appeal is dismissed.

The amount in deposit if any shall be transmitted to the District Commission for needful action.

Forward free copies to both parties.

 

                Sd/-                                                      Sd/-

MEMBER                                                      JUDICIAL MEMBER

KCS*

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ravishankar]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt.Sunita Channabasappa Bagewadi]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.