Sri Debasis Giri filed a consumer case on 13 Sep 2017 against Hahnemann Housing and Development Pvt. Ltd. in the Paschim Midnapore Consumer Court. The case no is CC/59/2017 and the judgment uploaded on 14 Sep 2017.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
PASCHIM MEDINIPUR.
Bibekananda Pramanik, President,
Pulak Kumar Singha, Member
and
Sagarika Sarkar, Member.
Complaint Case No.59/2017
Sri Debasis Giri, S/o-Prafulla Kumar Giri, Vill-Palua, P.O.-Tanna,
P.S.-Mohanpur, District- Paschim Medinipur..………..……Complainant.
Vs.
For the Complainant : Mr. Dipankar Pati, Advocate.
For the O.P. :
Decided on:13/09/2017
ORDER
Pulak Kumar Singha, Member :
Complainant files this case u/s 12 of the C.P. Act, 1986.
In short the case of the complainant is that the complainant had entered into an agreement with the O.Ps. for purchasing one sub plot of Master Plan made by O.Ps., measuring 2 (two) cottas or 1440 sq. ft. for consideration amount of Rs.1,16,668/- and together with development fees of Rs.3,50,000/- has been paid to the O.Ps. Agreement for
Contd……………P/2
( 2 )
sale of sub plot no.1082 was executed on 01/08/2013 and as per agreement a sum of Rs.1,16,668/- had been paid to the O.Ps. and rest amount i.e. plot development fees also paid on subsequent date. After payment of total consideration amount to the O.Ps., the complainant found that total area of the Master Plan including the sule-plot of complainant neither developed nor made any construction over that area. Complainant met with the O.Ps. and they assured that all necessary development work will be done soon but nothing relay nothing happened. Complainant approached the O.Ps. for return back the deposited amount but in vain.
Complainant appeared before this Forum for getting relief as per prayer of his complaint.
All the O.Ps. appeared after duly service of notice upon them but O.Ps. not contested the case. So, the case is heard ex-parte against all the O.Ps.
Decision with reasons
We have travelled over the complaint, evidence and documents filed by the complainant and it appears that O.Ps. were intended to sale various sub-plots by way of making Master Plan to different intending customers and for such sale O.Ps. gave advertisement and complainant was also intended to purchase one sub-plot, entered into an agreement for sale with the O.Ps. According to such agreement two cotts or 1440 sq. ft. plot being no.1082 was allotted against payment of Rs.1,16,668/- on 10/08/2013 and for development of the plot area and making construction of road, drain etc. complainant paid Rs.3,50,000/- on subsequent date i.e. within stipulated period as per agreement. It appears from the agreement that within three years from the date of execution of such agreement, after development of such plot area, O.Ps. shall be executed sale deed in favour of the complainant at the own cost of complainant. But after expiry of the stipulated period complainant found that no development work had done by the O.Ps. Then the complainant knocked the doors of O.Ps. on various offices but in vain. Complainant approached before the O.Ps. to return back the deposited amount but O.Ps. did not pay heed to the claim.
In spite of due service of summon O.Ps. appeared in this case but not contested the case. We think that the allegations against O.Ps. by the complainant is true and correct and O.Ps. have nothing to say to defend themselves. O.Ps. have received the money from complainant by way of deceitful manner and harassed the complainant day by day for which complainant has been suffering mental pain, agony and also monitory loss. O.Ps. are negligent and deficient in service and they are reluctant to obey the agreement.
In view of such discussions herein above we think that complainant proved his case and he is entitled to get relief as prayed for.
The complainant case succeeds.
Contd……………P/3
( 3 )
Hence, it is,
Ordered,
that the complaint case be and the same is allowed ex-parte with cost against the O.Ps.
O.Ps. are jointly or severally directed to pay Rs.4,66,668/- alongwith 9% interest from 01/08/2013, to pay Rs.20,000/- compensation for harassment, mental pain and agony and also to pay litigation cost of Rs.2,000/- to the complainant within one month from the date of this order.
Failure to comply this order O.Ps. shall have to pay Rs.2,000/- per month as penal cost to be paid to the Legal Aid Fund to this Forum till full realization.
Dictated and Corrected by me
Sd/- P.K. Singha Sd/- S. Sarkar Sd/-B. Pramanik.
Member Member President
District Forum
Paschim Medinipur
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.