Delhi

Central Delhi

CC/244/2016

ABDUL DAYYAN - Complainant(s)

Versus

GURUNANAK MOBILE TELECOM - Opp.Party(s)

28 Oct 2016

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/244/2016
 
1. ABDUL DAYYAN
G-73 C, TILAK VIHAR, TILAK NAGAR, NEW DELHI-110018
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. GURUNANAK MOBILE TELECOM
245/1, BANGAL COLONY, NAIWALA, KAROL BAGH, NEW DELHI-05.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. MOHD. ANWAR ALAM PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. VIKRAM KUMAR DABAS MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. MRS. MANJU BALA SHARMA MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 28 Oct 2016
Final Order / Judgement

ORDER                                 Dated:  28-10-2016

Mohd. Anwar Alam, President



Complainant and Opposite Party filed compromise today  which has been
attested by this Forum  on the same date.  Hence looking to the terms
of compromise, (Ex1) , OP2 has replaced the  product of the
complainant  i.e. Samsung led TV .  Both the parties mutually decided
the case and no more dispute is left between the parties.

As  OP2 has replaced the  product (Samsung led TV) hence the case is
settled. Copy of this order be made available to the parties free of
cost as per law and a copy be kept on separate file.  File be
consigned to record room.

Announced on this _______________

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. MOHD. ANWAR ALAM]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. VIKRAM KUMAR DABAS]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. MRS. MANJU BALA SHARMA]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.