Karnataka

Mandya

CC/10/71

Sri C.T.Bhaskar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Guru Teak Investments(Mysore) Pvt., Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

Inperson

21 Jul 2010

ORDER


DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANDYA
D.C.Office Compound, Opp. District Court Premises, Mandya - 571 401.
consumer case(CC) No. CC/10/71

Sri C.T.Bhaskar		 ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

Guru Teak Investments(Mysore) Pvt., Ltd.,		 ...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. Smt.A.P.Mahadevamma2. Sri.M.N.Manohara3. Sri.Siddegowda

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Orders The Complainant is absent. Perused the complaint. In the complaint where cause of action arase is not pleeded and Opposite party address is of Bangalore. So the complaint is not mainatinable before this Forum for want of Jurisdiction. Hence the complaint is not admitted. It is order to return the complaint for presentation before Jurisdictional Forum.




......................Smt.A.P.Mahadevamma
......................Sri.M.N.Manohara
......................Sri.Siddegowda